Free access to scriptures religious leaders try to censor
The full free market is impossible. Full libertarianism is impossible.
But if we have a free market on top of things, that’s good enough.
Find a cinema governed by the free market. In a sense, none are. In a sense, all are.
Each cinema has owners that govern the cinema. That owner can decide what movie to show and that you can’t bring your popcorn to the cinema.
However, the cinema themselves are governed by the market. If the owner decides to raise the ticket price you go to another cinema. If the owners murder customers, government get involved.
Murdering customers are “wrong.” That’s why even a libertarian like me will want somebody, either government or protectors or protectorate sponsors to interfere and punish murder.
Raising ticket price unfairly is also wrong. However, I do not consider that as too crazy because it’s something that can be corrected automatically by the free market anyway.
Things go wrong if I do not know the price before I get into the cinema and then once I am in they charged me a million dollar saying that there is a price increase.
The same with the state.
The free market does not govern the states. Not directly. We have voters; we have dictators, we have kings.
However, the states are governed by free market indirectly. As states compete with one another, countries become more and more minarchists.
States with high tax will have their taxpayers move to another country. A nation with minimum wage will have their jobs move to China.
So raising tax too high is “wrong” in my opinion. However, we don’t need to worry about that too much. Even if states have the right to raise tax too much, their rulers will, often have the incentive not to.
High taxes drive taxpayers away, like top ticket price drive customers away.
All we need to do is to speed that up.
States that are ruled by Luddites like the Qing dynasty will be forced to sign bad deals by more advanced states.
Countries already compete with one another. Let’s make provinces do that too.
I like libertarianism. I think the primary purpose of a state should be enforcing contracts and protecting people from force or fraud.
But how do we achieve that? How do we “force” a state to be libertarian?
We can’t. Even if we can, I am not sure about how right it is.
Is it okay to force China to import opium? What about forcing Europe to allow more immigrants? Or what about forcing Saudi Arabia to be secular? Or what about forcing Qatar to be democratic?
Is it right to do so?
Many people have this mindset that my ideology is the best, the only right one, and everyone must use this same ideology.
The communist, the capitalist, the democratist, the theocratist think that their idea is so great everyone should do it. They all think that the whole world should use their ideology. Often, libertarians are like that too.
I disagree. I like libertarianism. However, I do not consider those not libertarians as wrong. Like I love cheese, but it doesn’t mean that those who like chocolate is wrong.
I think rules from each state should be minimal just like rules for corporations.
Those should be things like
1. Don’t attack other states
2. Don’t prevent citizens from going out (unless probably jailed criminals)
3. Don’t change laws too abruptly so those who don’t like it can go
4. Don’t crucify cats (optional)
5. Do whatever you want. Just get rich.
That’s pretty much it. I think the market will take care of the rest.
States with too much tax will have taxpayers go to other countries.
I am not even sure rule #4 is essential. I mean, yet if a state can crucify cats, those states will have all tourists go. Also, other countries won’t join in the alliance of protecting such lands.
States that violate #4 will justly and karmically be invaded and conquered by other countries.