Maximization Of Productivity As A Whole

Say the cost of producing a corn is $5 per unit.

Say the market price for corn is $10 per unit.

That means we need more corn producers.

What about if the market price for corn is only $3?

That means we need subsidy. Or do we?

Perhaps those simply mean that we have too much corn.

Productivity as a whole will increase if less people produce corn.

And the beauty of it is that the market will take care of it.

Can we apply the same principles for corn to humans being?

We do!

In fact, just like the market sort of take care of it in corn; the market will sort of take care of it in humans’ reproduction.

Making a kid is like starting a business. Each kid is then a business. The worth of a business, and hence, the kid, is then the interest discounted present value of the expected difference between the kids’ productivity and their maintenance costs.

Say the present value of the cost of raising a brick layers is $500,000.00. Say the present value of expected productivity a brick layer will get is $200,000.00.

That means we need more subsidy. Or do we?

Perhaps those simply mean that we have too many blue collar workers.

Productivity as a whole will increase if we produce more movie star, entrepreneurs, and dentists than if we produce more blue collar workers.

And the beauty of it is the market will take care of it.

You see, women prefer the rich.

Those who are genetically predestined to pick occupation with high demand and low supply will get richer.

Their kind will attract more women and produce more kids. Voila… Without governments intervention in reproduction we already improve productivity as a whole.

What about if we do not pick our occupation based on our genetic material? What about if we pick our occupation based on free will?

No different. Males prefer as many pretty women as possible. When genetic quality doesn’t matter, the market mechanism will still motivate males to pick occupation yielding the most income.

We will increase the number of those in higher paid occupation, not by reproduction, but by motivation.

What about the losers?

What losers? There are no losers. Everyone is better off under free market.

Losing used to mean getting slaughtered for males and getting raped for females.

Nowadays, those things don’t happen anymore.

There are no losers. Just those who are less successful than other. But there is always disparity of success no matter what the system is.

All right, we can tax kids and pay dividend to all citizens to buy votes from the losers; I mean those who are not as successful as us yet.

Poor people prefer more cash than making more kids anyway. Meanwhile, they can always choose porn and prostitution till they’re rich enough to attract a wife.

Is Marriage Good For Women?

Is marriage good for women?

Many people want to prohibit prostitution and porn. They said those are so bad that they have to be prohibited.

So, if a woman wants to have sex, what’s the alternative for that? Marriage.

By prohibiting the alternatives, societies pretty much push people into marriage.

However, is marriage that good? I mean compared to porn and prostitution?

For example, I have a maid. His father wants to remarry. Well, if the father is rich, who care?

However, the father is poor. He wants to remarry and he demands my maid to supply him money.

What a jerk. However, no religious fundamentalists would condemn such acts as immoral.

I know other pretty women that want a divorce. However, it’s difficult to get a divorce.

The rule says that the man has to make a mistake first.

When we go to a restaurant, and we prefer another restaurant, do we need to proof that the restaurant has to make a mistake first?

Isn’t lack of desirability not a mistake?

We all try to maximize our profit. It’s simply natural that those who can give better offer get more in return.

Why marriage laws do not allow lack of wealth as justification for divorce?

Surely marriage can be a really bad deal for women.

Quite understandably, many women do not want to get married. Quite understandably, many women prefer to just be mistresses or porn star.

It’s very natural that pretty women want to flaunt their assets. It’s what advertising is all about.

However, prostitution, porn, and public nudity are prohibited. Why marriage is not?

People act that within marriage a couple own each other. Well, owning other people is slavery. Don’t we have slavery already?

Prostitution and porn have many obvious advantages over marriage. Pretty women in Indonesia, a relatively poor country, can $20,000 per year.

A porn star can earn much more.

It’s very natural then that women choose porn and prostitution over marriage.

But not all women are pretty enough to earn that kind of money in porn. Well, yea. So?

So what? Not everyone is able to become engineers, scientists, entrepreneurs, or even brick layers.

Do we prohibit engineering, science, and entrepreneurship simply because some people are not capable to do so?

The real reason why many women want porn and prostitution prohibited is because they are envy and want to get rid superior competitors from the gene pool.

The way we evolve is when we’re not at war, we’re in a race. Some people do not want to compete. Freedom means competition. So they oppose freedom and choose slavery.

What happens to society that stifles competition? Well, check out North Korea and see for yourself if free fair competition is really that bad.

Society’s pressures for marriage and against many consensual acts are unlikely there to protect the interests of the consenting parties.

It’s there to protect the interests of disgruntled competitors. Such disgruntled competitors are the one truly immoral and dangerous for society.

Of course, the envy bigots will claim the opposite.

Real Origin Of Monogamy

Why marriage tend to be monogamous?

Well, there are about the same number of males to females.

That seems like a pairing.

However, males want as many females as possible. Women prefer the best genes measurable by wealth.

Some restaurants, for example, are full. Some restaurants are empty.

There is no restriction that all restaurants deserve the same number of customers?

So why monogamy becomes the norm?

Look at the Arab. The oil money goes to the Arab king. Why? Because the Arab king is in power.

It seems that natural resources tend to get divided proportional to military power.

Say you productively create wealth, and then some robbers put gun in your head. Guess who will enjoy your wealth?

If this keep going then people will all try to be martial artists rather than farmers. So some societies come up with better ways to encourage acts that promote common interests more.

One such arrangements are democracy.

To understand how monogamy work, we need to understand the ancient Greek. The ancient Greek is the first democratic countries in the world.

Democracy has one benefit. Democracy replaces civil war. When we have different opinions of what governments should do, we can settle our different by voting rather than killing each other.

Democracy is also a stable social contract. If some guy get 80% of the vote. The other side will know that they won’t win anyway if they wage a civil war. So they may as well yield.

It comes with pluses and minus of course.

In ancient time, only the male can vote. Why? That’s because males are stronger than females. We are trying to replace a civil war you see.

If 60% of the population vote for Julius Caesar, but all of which are females, obviously it wouldn’t be a stable social contract. The other side will fight anyway rather than honoring the social contract.

Now, natural resources get divided proportional with ones’ political power. One man one vote soon leads to one man one wife.

And that’s why we have monogamy.

Why I Like Math A Lot?

So many people tell me I am stupid. However, I like Math.

Do you know why I like Math so much?

Well, in Math, everything is obvious. Every theorems, every formulas are derived.

So I always know why something is so.

And that’s not all. If something is not obvious for me, and I ask the professor, I know that it’s my fault.

It’s obvious. Perhaps my mind lapse of between the few crucial seconds when the professor explain it. It’s my fault.

However, Math teachers and Math professors don’t just get mad. They explain the stuffs to me as if it’s something tough to understand.

You see why I love Math?

However, life is not like Math. So many things in life are confusing and suspicious.

Why people defend truth by censorship and violence? Why when people talk about morality, they talk against porn, prostitution, and greed. Why not against stealing? Why no terrorists blow up thieves den? Why they blow up innocent tourists? Why difference of religious doctrines and believe justify war?

To me, all those are not obvious. Most apologetic explanation raise even more confusions and suspicions.

However, we have the Math of life. We have something like math that can consistently explain life’s phenomena in ways that make sense.

It’s called science. The math of inanimate object is Physics, which you’re all familiar with.

The math of life is evolution theory. That one is heavily censored.

It’ll be too long to explain, how it works. You can check it in my website at http://genepoolsurvivalguide.com

However, most of what people know about evolution theory is just the skin.

We know the basic of evolution theory in school. What we don’t know is that evolution theory can also be useful to predict humans’ nature and preferences.

From proper understanding of humans’ nature, we can predict what people would do. Then we can answer, explain, and predict their behaviors.

I’ll give a brief answer to those questions that I ask. If you want to know more, you need to check http://GenePoolSurvivalGuide.com for many other articles.

Why people defend truth by censorship? Because they don’t defend truth. They defend often untrue political opinions that serve their interests.

Why people oppose porn, prostitution, and greed? Because when we’re not at war, we’re in a race. When we’re in a race people want to knock down those who run the fastest. So many people are envy and want to criminalize success and happiness. If you enjoy life, or make a lot of money, they’re going to say it’s wrong.

Why people fight over religious doctrines? That’s because the way to be successful in countries that do not embrace meritocracy is to pit people against each other. The easiest justification for that comes from faith based fairy tales we call religions.

Why People Use Violent To Defend Truth?

I like Math.

Unlike Math, life is confusing. So many things are suspicious. Moreover, unlike Math, people don’t seem to see the difficulty.

When I have problems with Math, people tend to understand that this stuff is tough and explain it to me kindly.

Yet, so many things in life are suspicious. When I question it, people would say that I was the most stupid people on earth that don’t even know stuffs.

Why people defend truth by censorship and violence?

That doesn’t seem like the way to find truth. Imagine if you’re a judge. Some witness come and say that the defendants are guilty. But other witnesses belief the defendants are not guilty.

So you ask the prosecutors’ witness. Where are the defendants’ witness? The prosecutors say that he killed all the defendants witness to defend truth and justice.

He also said that he destroy all evidences that may deceive you as the judge, from concluding heretical opinions that the defendants are innocent.

There is a reason why we don’t have that case around. What would you do to that kind of prosecutors?

What about the other way around. Many defendants want to kill key witnesses. Do you think defendants that do that are innocents?

But that’s what organized religions do. There are many versions of Bible and books. Catholic churches burn them all. The church also slaughtered the gnostic.

There are many version of Quran, and Ali burn most of them.

Can you trust modern religious interpretors? Can you trust conclusions made by destroying evidences and killing those with different beliefs?

To me, why people defend truth with violence is not obvious. Most apologetic explanation raises even more confusion an suspicion.

However, we have the Math of life. We have something like math that can consistently explain life’s phenomena in ways that make sense.

It’s called science. The math of inanimate object is Physics, which you’re all familiar with.

The math of life is evolution theory. That one is heavily censored.

It’ll be too long to explain, how it works. You can check it in my website at http://genepoolsurvivalguide.com

I’ll give a brief explanation to the question I was asking.

Why people defend truth by censorship and violence? They don’t defend truth. They defend opinions that serve their interests. Moreover, such opinions are usually false. Real truths don’t need that kind of protection.

If some people draw offending caricature against globalization or capitalism, how many businessmen like Bill Gates, Warren Buffet, will get offended and demand restriction of freedom of speech against such cartoons?

Free market works. There is no need to defend it with violence.

Speak in Jesus era that the Pharisees are hypocrites. Speak in middle age Europe that the Pope is wrong in thinking that the sun circle the earth. Speak in Tokugawa era Japan that Amaterasu Omikami don’t even exist, let along have descendants.

Speak in Russia during Lenin that communism doesn’t work. Tell Indonesian during Suharto era that Suharto is a dictator. Or draw any cartoons, or make any movies suggesting that the founder of Muslim religions might have something to do with suicide bombing, freedom oppression, and women subjugation. Chance is you’ll die.

Of course, those who defend their opinions through violence will not going to honestly say that they do so out of selfish interests. To gain credibility they’re going to say that they defend truth.

How can what they defend is true? Faith. Discussion end.

Why People Fight Over Religious Doctrines

I like Math.

Unlike Math, life is confusing. So many things are suspicious. Moreover, unlike Math, people don’t seem to see the difficulty.

When I have problems with Math, people tend to understand that this stuff is tough and explain it to me kindly.

Yet, so many things in life are suspicious. When I question it, people would say that I was the most stupid people on earth that don’t even know stuffs.

Why people fight over differences of religious doctrines?

I mean there are so many evil people in the earth. There are thieves. There are robbers. There are burglars. There are fraudsters. But why we fight those with different beliefs?

To me, why people fight heresy is not obvious. Most apologetic explanation raises even more confusions and suspicions.

However, we have the Math of life. We have something like math that can consistently explain life’s phenomena in ways that make sense.

It’s called science. The math of inanimate object is Physics, which you’re all familiar with.

The math of life is evolution theory. That one is heavily censored.

It’ll be too long to explain, how it works. You can check it in my website at http://GenePoolSurvivalGuide.com

I’ll give a brief explanation to the question I was asking.

And why people fight over difference of religious doctrines

The way we evolve is when we’re not at war, we’re in a race. People want to knock down those who run the fastest. When envy bigots can do so effectively, how to be successful then

Before free market, the most successful people in the earth are not businessmen.

At that time, we didn’t have Bill Gates streamlining operating system to the whole world.

We didn’t have Warren Buffet buying stocks and commodity when everyone wants to sell and supplying commodities when everyone wants to buy.

Nor did we have Thomas Edison that invents so many useful goods for society.

Why? That’s because in countries with plenty of envy bigots, you can’t be successful honestly. No matter how honest, fair, and productive the way you make your money, you’re still hated. When the bigots are the one influential, which means you’re still death.

So how do successful kings, emperors, and dictators maintain their success They do so by showing people that they’re not competitors. How? By ensuring that we’re not in competition. So what’s the alternative War…

So that people don’t fight their king, a wise king will come up with some common enemies the people should kill and fight to unite the people.

When Frederick from Holy Roman Empire attack the Pope, the Pope wisely told all those excess hot heads to attack the Muslims in another crusade.

When a Sultan have full harem, how can he prevent those who don’t get any women from rebelling By encouraging the non alpha males to commit Jihad. So that they die. Gee, and all this time we are taught that prostitution is inhuman.

That’s why Saladin didn’t destroy all Christian cities. He left some. Saladin knew that once common enemies are gone, the Muslims will fight against each other.

He could also be quite compassionate. However, any preferences must have some selfish motive too right. That’s the fundamental assumptions behind selfish genes theory. And that’s an assumption that has correctly predict plenty of phenomena.

Of course, it won’t be fair to pick only Christians and Muslims as samples. The truth is all societies have their fair share of war that’s unworthy to fight.

Some wars are necessary. When US don’t have nukes aimed at China, they’re dust, literally. The same way when China don’t have nukes aimed at US, we’re dust literally too.

When we’re not at war, we’re in a race. Some people are not competitive, so they want war. The underlying structure of life is a virtual latent gun fight.

If we do not want to die, we either have to kill or make a credible threat that we are able and willing to kill when things go too far against our interests.

The way to make that credible threat is by actually killing on some small scales. So some war is necessary.

That’s why I support Death Penalty. I also suggest that we should do it once in a while to those who really ask for it. That’s how we create a credible threat against murders, and robbers. In doing so, we protect the innocents.

However, most of the time, the other side do not attack us. We can make money honestly and productively. Many times, there is simply no good reason for war.

So why war? What’s the justification for that war? Guess what Fairy tales like religions of course.

Religions can justify anything. Faith does not require evidences. Hence, it’s a perfect justification for those who want to pit people against each other.

We see that countries that fail to embrace freedom and meritocracy are countries plagued with religious prosecution and war over differences of faith. That’s simply how to be successful in such countries. Pit people against each other.

It’s so easy to downplay and exaggerate an aspect of life. Punishing thieves will put power in the hand of weak but productive individuals. Punishing the innocents will put power in the hand of politicians. Of course, politicians prefer the latter.

Prostitution, Porn, Homosexuality And Welfare

They said that it’s to protect morality.

However, that’s just pretexts. Pretexts, while contain some truth in it, are filled with incoherency and will often fail to predict people’s behavior.

A governments official may talk at length the virtue of prohibiting factories with high labors’ productivity. Their real motives are to get bribe from factories that cannot compete with the prohibited factories.

Understanding the real motives will help us solve the problem. We can choose to bribe more money or tell the truth to population depending on whether the deceived people are committed to freedom of speech or not.

We need science to probe real reasons behind those pretexts. Understanding the true reasons will give us advantages over those who do not.

Now, to understand why people oppose porn, prostitution, and homosexuality, we need to understand the mother of all sex laws against victimless consensual sex, anti polygamy laws.

The reasons, as you can find in http://GeneTips.com with plenty of scientific explanations, are to ration females in equal share for everyone.

Moreover, humans tend to be dysgenic because they want to get rid superior competitors. When we’re not at war, we’re in a race. That’s simply the way we evolve. Freedom means competition. Some people are not competitive. So they oppose freedom.

Free sex means free competition in desirability. This will wipe out unsexy people out of the gene pool.

So, becoming sexy and advertising sexual desirability will motivate others to kill you.

For example, because women prefer the rich, rich means sexy for males. So when one man gets rich the other will get in the way. Hence we have communism.

Males prefer the pretty, hence pretty means sexy for women. Of course, beauty is not just outside but also inside clothes. So when a woman advertises her beauty in porn, the other women will oppose it. Hence we have anti porn laws.

That’s why most humans belong in either liberal communist party or religious fascist conservative party.

The liberal want to prevent you from getting rich. The conservatives want to ration females in equal share for everyone to the unsexy so even if you do get rich, you can’t just easily and consensually make thousands of kids.

It starts of with the democratic Greece. Democracy means one man one vote. Natural resources get divided proportional with men’s bargaining power. One men one vote soon leads to one men one wife.

But the true reason behind anti prostitution and anti homosexuality goes beyond that. Not all males mind that some males get more females. Some males are poor and would rather have more money. Some males are happy because they have prostitution. Some males are homosexual and really don’t care. All those males either don’t mind or easy to appease.

What happened when Titus sieged Jerusalem on 70 AD? The Zealots terrorist groups burn the Jews’ food supply to ensure no peace agreement.

Porn, prostitution, welfare, and homosexuality are, in a sense, food supplies that’ll provide an alternative to marriage. When all those are legal, those who want to wipe out the best and brightest males from the gene pool will not have enough supporters.

The non alpha males will think, “All right, Bill Gates get so many females, but he’s rich, and he pays tax. We got richer because of him and can use the money to get rich too and attract females or hire prostitutes. He’s useful enough for the society we should just let him be.”

Prohibition of porn, prostitution, welfare, and homosexuality will put all non alpha males in a situation where they can either get married or live a shagless life. Given those alternatives, most non alpha males will insist on prohibiting polygamy.

And that’s the real reason why.

Moreover, of course, those who do not enjoy prostitution and porn are more easily persuaded to join an army or even a suicide bombing squad.

The Two Most Politically Incorrect Sentences in Western Civilization

Sentence 1: Men naturally want as many females as possible.
Sentence 2: Women want the best genes.

These 2 sentences can be very politically incorrect.

Especially sentence 2. Women want the best genes, imply that there are such things as best genes.

What are the best genes?

Whichever customers prefer. Continue reading “The Two Most Politically Incorrect Sentences in Western Civilization”