Why Men Should Think of Women as Sex Objects

Free access to scriptures religious leaders try to censor

I guess Mama corrected me on a fine point.

Actually I should have made this point clearer.

You see, a meat butcher does not need to know what spices vegetarian likes. The same way, a normal heterosexual men does not need to know what non sex object women want. At least on a libertarian regime. That’s what I mean.

Say only 5% of women are sex objects and like it.

Well, those 5% are your target market.

The other 95% is totally irrelevant. Even if you were wrong. Say they did not like to be sex objects. So what? They’re not your target market. You’re not going to deal with them anyway. 95% is a type of error that doesn’t matter (I forget type 1 or type 2).

For that reason, men tend to think that women are sex object. We pay nothing for being wrong.

I see western civilization is becoming more like Spartan where the only one that breed is the one that break the rules by going out of barracks. Spartans were very proud of their tradition. Their birth rate also plummeted because of that and so was their hegemony.

Obviously women need to be a sex object in order to reproduce. Women are descendants of women that become sex objects.

So, that number is not 5%. That number is more like 80%-95% in my opinion.

Another reason why I advocated that we all think that women as sex object is because when we don’t, again and again, I see that she ended up being sex objects anyway, on the hand of some lesser males that value her freedom far less than us.

For example, say American males do not import third world women into becoming sex workers in US. Then those women will ended up staying in a poor country with her clits cut and forced to wear burqha and stuff. However, if American males simply allow those women to be a stripper, for example, then all beautiful girls all over the world will be free from oppression. Any countries that insist on oppressing them will see their prettiest girls go to US. Of course, american females won’t allow it because they too hate competition.

By the way, did you read the articles I mentioned?

He said about every time a guy commit polygamy with 3 women he deprived 2 men out of women. Actually he’s wrong. The main reason why a reasonably rich male in rich countries cannot get laid is not because of polygamists. The main reason is that feminazis prohibit importing those women to rich countries. That’s the real reason behind laws against women trafficking. After all, if force or fraud is involved in women trafficking, we already have laws against force, fraud, or rape right?

However I showed you the article so that you know what the real problem is. I know libertarianism do not like to generalize people. Libertarian expect to treat everyone equally. However, it’s still important, I think, to know what humans typically behave. Now that’s what evolutionary psychology is all about. Knowing that will help us understand what’s really behind religious bigotry, feminazis, etc. It’s not what they always says. It’s actually very far fetches.

And yea prohibited activity are not prohibited because no body could possibly want it. Most of the time, it’s prohibited because TOO MANY want it.

Now I need a female opinion on this because all the other males here don’t seem to agree with me.

Mama, you’re new here. What do you think? Now not only you’re more than sex object, you could be the only actual libertarian female expert on what females want here.

Why I Really Hate Marriage, Feminazis and Religious Bigots?

I used to be a pious normal christian planning to marry just one girl, got moderately rich, and live happily ever after with only one girl.

I didn’t know about what girls want. Many says hi to me, but I ignored most of them. After all I wanted to be rich and I am not ready to marry yet. I didn’t sleep with any of them, so there is no way I know for sure whether a girl want me for sex, or just wanting to know me.

I was 26, 7 years ago, when I discovered my high school books. I have been searching for that books for so long. There was a girl I really like and would like to call. Let’s call her TO1 (Target Operation #1).

Turns out she’s married. I was shocked. So fast? I was still playing video games here. I didn’t know that girls mature faster than males. Their clocks tick faster and harder.

I wasn’t usually emotional. However, at that time, I feel like I was in hell. I called her, sms her how much I “love” her, yada yada yada, doesn’t work.

I knew I have failed. All right. She says no. No means no. I got to move on.

But move on where? What is all the money I’ve earned for?

Well, let’s just make sure things are not working out one more time. Somehow I sort of feel like it.

I realized that I had been very wrong. After all, how could I be right? I knew absolutely nothing about what women want. I know men want pretty women. What kind of men women want?

Obviously my stupid theory that women is just God’s gift, was not working out. I got to know what women wanted. I learned that from 2 resources. Evolutionary psychology books, and my worker, a playboy that have slept with hundreds of women. No, he’s not a serial rapist, quite obviously. I got to make that clear because that’s the kind of assumption that people often jump into.

No, I am not suggesting forcing beautiful girls to have sex with you. I am suggesting all males, especially the rich and smart, to treat beautiful girls as sex objects consensually if and only if they want it. You’d be surprised with what you can achieve consensually and the real reasons why all those are politically incorrect. Oh ya, I know you want it. If not, this is not for you. Of course, consensual doesn’t mean legal. But there are ways if we really want to.

Some of the main points are banal but quite surprising.

Turns out men chase women and not the other way around. It’s confusing. I used to think it’s the other way around. I mean we pay for everything right? Shouldn’t they be chasing us? How come all the other males say the opposite? The other males are true. How the hell I didn’t get it would be another post.

Another fact is banal. Turns out men are not equal, at least not equally sexy. If males are equal, or almost equal, then the only reason why women would pick one man over the other is because he “loves” her more or at least that would be the main factor.

In fact, I sometimes avoid beautiful girls because I didn’t feel I will be a devoted loving husband for her. I thought that she’ll be happier with someone else. I thought I did the right thing. After all I thought I only need one beautiful girl as a wife. I thought that’s what all other males wanted too.

Societies tend to support those beliefs. A man that sleeps with pretty girls and don’t marry her is called irresponsible. It’s kind of strange that man are called irresponsible because he choose not to marry and not because he’s poor. I don’t question it though.

Hei, I thought I am a responsible male. Hence I thought I will only screw a girl I married, or at least would marry. Because I would only marry one, I thought I would have to be very selective on girls even though I feel very attracted to so many of them.

So what makes one men sexier than the other? This is again, not something can be learned through reasons alone. Actually you can if you have the right basic theories. If you count on politically correct, feminist, or religious theories, you’re not going to be able to predict anything accurately.

Basically you need cold hard facts and lots of experience and practice. These kinds of facts are so politically incorrect hidden behind layers and layers of politically correctness.

To my surprise, how handsome a man is, is on the bottom of the list. And no, how much you loved her is not way on top either. What’s on top is actually wealth and power.

Wait a minute. If women prefer the rich, how can there be any kid with poor dad? Also, why are we prohibiting prostitution again? And what are all these arguments on how we got to end poverty, yada yada yada?

If women prefer the rich, we can easily just let the market take care of it and suddenly all kids will have rich smart dad right?

Well, another huge topic. Basically kids have poor dads because those dads are powerful enough to extort money from wimpy capitalists and kick those capitalists out of the mating market. That power is called voting. It mainly happens in democracy though. So, you still think your votes don’t matter ha?

It’s the same reason why ugly girls get laid too even in rich countries where virtually none of the males need to settle for someone that ugly. Those ugly girls, also called feminazis, have ways to kick pretty girls out of most mating market.

Women prefer the rich? I was shocked. I was a pious Christian.

Years before I had gotten some typical Christians email saying that key to happiness for a male is not to marry pretty women and key to happiness for female is not to pick the rich. When I read that, I knew the statement is half wrong. I am a male, and I know key to happiness for males are of course pretty women. That email was a libel against all beautiful girls in the world.

But hei, beautiful girls are like out of reach goddesses that like to tease mortal’s emotion nevertheless. It’s hard to be sympathetic to those heartless snobbish almighty goddesses that don’t seem to need sympathy.

Now I know that the email is not only half wrong, it’s pure wrong. It turns out religious ideas are not only not perfect, not good, not proven, but is often quite the total opposite of what’s reality is. And that’s not a coincidence.

Yap. Most religious ideas are actually disprovable, understandable, and predictable. If not, they’ll have no effect. If they have no effect, religious bigots won’t bother defending it. The most popular religious ideas that are said again and again and again are usually vague enough to be hard to disprove and yet suggesting the exact opposites of facts.

Also most religious doctrines are easily understandable and predictable. It’s always the interest of whoever interprets that religion. Also it’s almost always at the expense of others, usually outsiders, but quite often their most naïve and pious followers.

The truth is the one that’s the nicest and most pious will be fighting over the scrap so the real meat will go to religious guru.

If religious bigots tell you that the path of happiness is in one direction, trust me, the other way around is most likely to be true. And chance is they know it. That’s the very reason why they told you to find happiness somewhere else, so they can have more of the meat for themselves.

Just look at those Arab sultans that have orgies while their followers can’t even read playboy. It’s been like this for centuries except that now we all know it thanks to wikileak. Of course all those angry followers will vent their anger to somebody nice. That’s usually some wimpy clueless libertarian capitalists that support porn.

Well? Not like they can easily screw the powerful dictators, and kings right?

Yap all those genocide victims are all guilty for the greatest crime in the world. Being nice to their enemies. No wonder they’re the one getting screwed, and till they repent, will go extinct. Of course, that’s exactly the crime religions want us to commit.

Oh there is another surprising fact in those books. I used to believe that polygamy is illegal because it’s so bad and no women could possibly want to share.

The truth is somewhat the opposite again. Most women want to share.

Also, if all are equal, women actually prefer males that already have women rather than single males. Yes beautiful women knew you’re a likely cheater. She is hard wired to seek studs.

So one benefit of getting married, I must admit, is to signal that at least you can nail one beautiful girl. Norms against sex outside marriage pretty much force all other acquisition underground.

You can advertise that by videotaping the fucking and releasing it. A popular singer just went to jail in my country for that.

Secondarily, women also like males with a special talent, say math skills. I guess that was why a few beautiful girls often approach me.

All those girls I chased are girls that have made some effort to approach me.

A cute young Irish girl, for example, asked me to massage her when I was in US when she saw that I got perfect scores on Math exams. The second highest scores are around 70. White girls are indeed bolder than Asian girls.

Of course at that time, and till years after that, I was only interested in money and well, probably marriage. She’s hot, but not hot enough to marry. Under no circumstances I would marry anyone that like to get drunk and go to parties. Also I believed in no sex before marriage. So she was useless.

So all these religious ideas totally change humans’ behavior in selecting mates. Men become very selective because they pick girls to marry rather than to sleep with. Males are no longer promiscuous and be available to hot girls. Suddenly chastity becomes more important than beauty. Since when?

As usual the one losing the most from religious ideas are beautiful girls that don’t mind being sex objects. The biggest winners are of course, the ugly ones. Now I see why female religious bigots are usually ugly.

Girls trying to get close to me are not as plenty as males that chase TO1, but I guess I wasn’t too bad after all.

And not bad I was. I earned almost $10k permonth residual income. Check. Women want to have smart kids. I am very good at Math. Check. Conclusion: With 80% probability, I could be sexier than her hubby. That’s not too bad. There is hope. It’s above 0 right?

So I asked my playboy workers how I can show my target operation how much I love her. He said, don’t bother. All I need is to show that I am rich in a credible way.

That’s easy. Expensive restaurant lunch in a 5 star hotel should do it. Now I see why cars, flowers, and restaurants are expensive. We can’t pay women directly so we spend money on all those doodads to signal wealth. Exactly like what evolutionary psychology told.

Yap. Love doesn’t matter. Maybe it matters in marriage, but not much outside marriage. After all, the most tell tale sign of love is loyalty. Loyalty is the cheapest to males that don’t sell. Of course, by requiring marriage before sex, governments pretty much support those males’ interest at the expense of studs. Now I see why most movie stars are atheists.

Those books taught me that women in free sex market are very expensive. So if I want discounts, I should aim for girls that know I am good at Math.

You can guess what I did next. I called every beautiful girls on my high school book. Out of 5 girls that I really like, 3 is in US, never coming back, I bet sucking some whity cocks. Heh, lucky bastards. If only they knew how to grow balls and what they can achieve.

I guess the evolutionary psychology book is right again. Beautiful girls are daughters of beautiful moms, which marry rich dads. Those then can afford sending their daughters to western countries.

Well some of those hotties are still stranded in my country. I ended up befriending one of them. Let’s call her TO5.

Within 1 month, everything is just perfect. I got a female friend for the first time in my life. I got report that TO#1 is divorcing and don’t mind sharing and obviously hate marriage. Got to be a match made in heaven. What else I could hope for? Yes yes yes.

Things don’t go that easily though.

There is no “no fault” divorce in Indonesia.

Oh ya, expectedly, not being rich enough or not being attractive enough is not a “fault”. In fact, divorce will not be granted if the judge knew that a girl prefer someone richer.

See, government fed the poor because we think it’s not their fault that they are poor. What I learned is, governments also force women to pick poorer males because it’s supposedly not his fault, at least in this case.

The fact that she is married is not the real issue. Even outside marriage, many males, and hence government, want to prevent consensual sex between rich males and many women. Most women will not get married if not because of those rules.

Let me try to understand here. Under free market, of course we all pick the best most attractive offers. Under marriage, rules are the exact opposite of market rules.

Also, adultery is a crime, which means those marriages, has “bite”.

Her hubby simply declared that he “loves” her so much he’s not letting her go.

I was shocked. She wanted out. He forced her. That’s rape. Even rape victim does not have to keep servicing her rapist.

And so what with this bullshit contract called marriage? Virtually all better alternatives are prohibited. Prostitution, concubine, is so politically incorrect or illegal. Information about them is censored and their acts are driven underground.

In fact, when a study shows that 30% of Indonesian teenagers have sex outside marriage, the study is censored.

Now it’s too late. If only I knew what girls want I would have asked her much earlier. If only I didn’t follow that stupid Christian norm of avoiding sex outside marriage, I would have had enough experience to know.

But what did I know? All I knew are religious bullshit that’s the exact opposite of truth. They’ve been lying to me all this time. I feel like I am in hell, knowing that all this time people have been lying to me.

I’ve heard stories about a guy living in hell and want to tell everyone else on how not to go there. It is said that not only it can’t be done, even if it’s done, no body would believe it anyway.

Well, I am not in that kind of hell. I can still tell others not to repeat the same mistakes I do. We live in an information age. I do not know whether heaven or hell exist after we die.

I do know what happiness and grief are in our life. Happiness means get rich, get laid with lots of beautiful women, and inherit all your wealth to your biological offspring while exterminating any bigots that get on your way.

I also know that others would go the extra mile preventing you from achieving happiness. I know I am not happy. I know I can’t trust those religious bigots to get happiness on my earthly life. I know that I also cannot trust those bigots on my after life happiness.

You see all those norms that tell us not to get laid before marriage, the romance, the prohibition of porn, the “dangerous for minor” censorship, and stuff?

It’s not really there made by God or other benevolent entities to lead us to happiness. It’s there made by bigots that want to drive us out of the gene pool for their own happiness.

Don’t take my words on it. Just look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H._Beatty_Chadwick or http://www.ifeminists.com/e107_plugins/content/content.php?content.558 or http://www.answerbag.com/q_view/126323 . Many have faced far worst fate than I am. That’s the kind of hell religious bigots want to put you into when they told you to get married.

It’s not even in the bible. Where in the bible does it say you have to agree to pay half of your earning for life if you’re married? Well if you get married, you effectively agree to it, something the bible never tell you to agree.

However, religion is not really about God. It’s more about political interests. Bigots want to make mating expensive for rich smart males to drive them out of the gene pool. It’s that simple.

I know a woman that get married, and is left by her husband that leaves nothing but debt. But that’s legal. However, if that same women obviously choose a better deal being a concubine with a rich smart males, then everybody will say it’s exploitation, and can be illegal due to anti prostitution laws.

It never is about protecting women. It’s more about rationing them, from those with better offers, for those who can’t give better offers.

And faith is not just an eccentricity. It’s a powerful tool that allows power hungry bigots to defame, condemn, or exalt anyone without proof.

Reasoning won’t work against those. Why should it? If government says that Bob’s cock is the best and anyone picking others’ cock must be duped or forced, wouldn’t Bob agree? The more evidence that other males may provide better offer, the more reason Bob would fight for his faith.

The same way, marriage is cheap for the poor and loyalty is cheap for males that don’t sell. If government says that marriage with love and loyalty terms are the best, most poor males would agree. In fact, the more evidence showing women actually prefer cash, or taller males, or smarter males, the more reason the mass would fight for their faith.

You can make as much money as you want, but when you start being very successful in the gene pool, somebody will get mad for some unclear reason. Winning means succeeding in the gene pool, which means driving everyone else out.

Something they can’t tolerate. If no body is mad or sad, you’re not achieving anything worthwhile. Seriously.

Now I regretted a lot of portion on my life. Why do I only aim for wealth? No matter how much wealth I have, if I am not powerful, I’ll never get those prime meats. I wanted that cunt for 14 years and some one else just override her decision.

Ah, but she agreed to commit to that for the whole of her life.

Or does she? Did she write the contract? No. Governments make that contract after prohibiting and driving underground all alternatives.

What are we agreeing to anyway when we’re married? Most material terms are not even explicitly stated. Did Beatty Chadwick agreed to go to jail for 14 years should he fail to pay her future wife $2 million? Well, like sex it’s not exactly part of the marital vow. However, everybody sort of knows that’s what those vows mean right? Or do they?

But something doesn’t add up. We prohibit prostitution because women are “trapped” in prostitution. At least prostitutes can get out easily.

Should women have right to make such a life time commitment? If so, what about right of men and women that do not want to commit or want a different type of commitment?

Sex outside marriage, while not illegal in Indonesia, is very politically incorrect and is illegal in many provinces. Many acts associated with it are illegal making it a landmine.

And then there is an issue about how a life time commitment is close to slavery.

Can people agree to be slave? We can rent our self (as in working), but we can’t sell our self right?

But marriage is the opposite. Renting, or prostituting, is illegal and yet selling or marrying is legal, in fact favored.

Also I got a death threat from an SMS. I was confused. Why was hubby mad? Not like I planned to rape his wife. His wife wanted a divorce here. I did nothing wrong.

I am very surprised that some males would resort to force to get or keep girls. Me, no matter how much I like a beautiful girl, I would let her go if she chooses someone else. I probably just want to make things clear for a while, and after that move on.

Hell I would even introduce her to friends richer than I am. That way she has plenty of choice. Not like I want too many girls anyway.

All in all the whole sexual norms in my society points to something pretty simple. A girl that I really liked, that might have wanted me, had to choose someone else. I was desperate. What the hell I was supposed to do?

Obviously that asshole is not going to let her go. She’s pretty. For that same reason, most middle class males would oppose sex outside life long monogamous marriage. Also most ugly women in rich countries would oppose pretty sex workers coming from poor countries. They all have intensive to oppose free competition.

For all my life, I have never expected that I would fail to get the girl I want, simply because another male disagree. Of course another male would disagree. But what right do they have? Oh yea, voting right, and bullshitting right. How can I forget that?

Then I saw why religious bigots do not want us to have sex outside marriage. All is so they can put men in this hell. All so many men refrained from accepting girls till they day societies have good enough reason to force the girl to choose someone else.

Then I saw why everybody has to graduate high school at the same speed. So that the smartest don’t just graduate faster and make money much earlier.

Then I understood why Nazis want to kill Jews so much. It’s the same reason behind extermination of the Armenian or riots against the Chinese in Indonesia, or income tax in US.

Gene pool survivals of less competitive males depend on extermination of those who are more competitive. Usually that means richer smarter males. Jews were typically richer and smarter than their peers. So off they go.

After all, no sex outside marriage is effectively genocide against those who hates marriage. I hate marriage. Yet many people insisted we can only breed if we agree to their terms. Who the hell are they that they decide terms of my reproductive success?

What are those terms? The most tell tale sign is loyalty. Yes marriage brings happiness to many people. However, what kind of males can easily offer loyalty and fear being left by his girl friend?

Loyalty is the only thing relatively expensive for studs. As Beatty Chadwick has shown, marriage is the only thing relatively expensive for the rich. And that’s the exact reason why bigots consider that “ideal.” So ideal they want to prohibit the rest.

I don’t care if no girls want me. However, if a beautiful girl wants me and some other jerk tries to forcefully prevent that, I would consider that as attempted genocide. It’s only fair then, that I too should do my best to drive out all jerks similar to them out of the gene pool.

It’s not hard. Really isn’t. Marriage is there to ration mates, usually women, in equal share for everyone. Women, of course don’t want to be rationed. So when alternatives to marriage become “visible” and politically correct, most kids will be born out of wedlock. Outside marriage, politics matter less. So that means most poor males won’t get laid. Suckers…

Well, not really. Governments still have laws against many consensual acts like prostitution and richer males are less likely to risk breaking laws. I guess women are so precious there is no way politics are out of the question, at least for now.

Bigots will prohibit so many consensual stuffs while arguing that rich males and women don’t really want to make kids together anyway.

But then again, I shouldn’t bitch that much. I am not the only one.

There are plenty of other rich males that want to keep several wives and concubines.

Yet they can’t because other males disagree. Just recently I’ve heard Indonesian government kick some rich Arabs because they engage in contract marriage with several village girls saying it’s exploitative.

Evolution theory predicts that girls actually want them. After all, it’s consensual right? All those girls can choose to marry a poorer male but choose to share a rich one instead. That’s actually the very real reason why prostitution and polygamy is illegal.

What about TO5? Well, things are working out well. She still gets a lot of SMS from her ex boyfriend. At first I was sympathetic to that bf cause. After all, I understood how he felt. I was chasing TO1.

My girlfriend told me that her ex boyfriend is very rich. Hmm… If some rich male is truly devoted to her, surely she is happier with him. I guessed I’d just give a call to help straighten up the situation.

I phoned the ex boyfriend explaining how women prefer the rich. “You’re rich right?” I said, just making sure. Also “You should just grab as many women as possible like me,” I explained, “Women prefer studs.”

A week after that we’re going out together and that ex boyfriend was chasing us with his car. No matter where we turn he’s trailing us. I thought I’ll just beat him up.

We moved to a police station instead. We would report that this guy is chasing us.

To my surprise, he simply reported me to cops. But what did I do wrong? He’s the one that’s harassing my friend. Now he’s chasing us. That vermin bitch about how I was arrogant and try to demean him, bla bla bla.

I was scared. It wasn’t true. Even if it were true, it’s not a crime. But somehow that kind of accusation has always been problematic. What about if the cop choose to side with that vermin? Then I got to spend a lot of money on lawyers. I hate spending money. When that happens, I would be really mad and that would be war. That means spending more money.

The cop told me not to talk. Then he told him nicely that someone above simply didn’t decide TO5 and him to be a couple.

Strange theory in my opinion. All those older men must have known the truth. Somehow they keep trying to protect the young generation from truth with all these censorship and bullshit theory. Seems to work at calming that crazy bigot for a while.

I learned that her ex boyfriend wasn’t rich. In fact, he was a failed student in his school that never graduates. His parents are rich. However, women pick the rich not mainly for the money. Women pick the rich because wealth signals capability. I am, after all, a proud businesses founder.

What did I do wrong against that asshole? That being said, what did porn stars, polygamists, studs, playboys, pimps, do wrong against anyone? All bad things are accused to them.

For example, some guy claimed that violence and fraud happens during prostitution. Even if that were true, why not prohibits fraud and violence? Why prohibits prostitution?

As far as I know violence, force, and fraud happens on any sexual relationship, including, and especially marriage. Here a girl couldn’t get a divorce here. That’s force. Plain and simple.

Now I got that. All this time I thought I should play nice. I once ignored a beautiful javanese girl that called me and just walk away. I never really gave those girls a chance to choose me do I?

What happens if I do not treat beautiful girls as sex objects? Someone else will. That someone else will have far less to offer, and value her freedom much less.

All I need to do is to tell the truth about how bad marriage can be, and poof, alternatives will be legal as more and more people don’t want to get married.

All is not lost. Even though I do not get TO1, I have learned a lot. So I will just aim for as many beautiful girls as I want. Also I will promote sex outside marriage so the richest smartest males can make as many kids as possible eliminating poverty. And all those bigots that oppose free fair competition will go extinct by themselves to avenge this entire problem. Easy right?

No. Every method for rich smart males to beget many kids are blocked. Polygamy is illegal. Outside marriage the amount of child support is set up proportional to mans’ wealth. No matter how wealthy you are, you can’t breed 10-20 kids easily. All kind of sexual contract are set in a way that males’ obligation is proportional to the man’s wealth. It’s tricky to do otherwise.

In Arab, polygamy is legal. But it’s power, not wealth, which allows societies to “bless” that kind of studs. As we see, Arabs are naturally monarchic.

Also there is one big problem left. TO5 wants marriage. But that’s easy. With all the knowledge and money I accumulated to get TO1, I can just aim for quantity, which is better than quality anyway. Then I would tell her that I can get all these hot cunts outside marriage, she simply has to be my girlfriend outside marriage. Evolutionary psychology books say that she’ll accept and if she doesn’t, I had a huge bargaining position anyway to hardball on the deal.

After all, not getting the girl I wanted came with a good perk of not paying and having to put up with her. At least in my country it’s still the case.

In some countries, men are paying anyway whether girls choose them or not. In addition, they have to put up with all those feminazis bullshit irrelevant of the fact that neither they nor the feminazis are sexually attracted to each other. Suckers….

To my horror, it’s not easy to knock up lot of girls. The issue is not attracting them. The issue is again, the norms. The norms are always against those no matter what you do. If you pay, then prostitution is illegal. If you don’t pay then you’re irresponsible and creating poverty. If you mate with smart rich independent women, then chance is you’ll mate with girls that are too busy to breed. If you lie, you’re a fraud. If you’re honest, then you’re arrogant.

Ah there is one other solution: Free sex with normal women. That seems to be theoretically impossible. So, how come the white guys do it anyway?

I went on a date with another pretty girl. I asked her whether she wanted free sex or marriage because I couldn’t offer her marriage. She said, in western countries where government is paying for all the kids anyway, she would prefer free sex. However, here, she needs cash to raise the kids.

That’s very honest and reasonable answer in my opinion. Of course it raised a lot of important corollary.

Welfare programs in rich countries not only take money from the productive, but actually take girls away from the productive. Sex must be free on liberal regime. You can’t even pay for it because prostitution is illegal. Not only you can’t pay, you don’t have to pay because everyone else will be like cuckold husbands paying for your kids through tax.

So, women want marriage mainly to have her kids afforded. Well, does she need rich males to commit to go to jail for 14 years for not paying her 2 million dollars like Beatty Chadwick? No. At least not unless she got another males committing $3 million competing for her.

So we can think of marriage as a form of price control then, where women have to demand more from the richer. That means rich males are not available to them and they have to pick the poor again.

Now I see why the rich make few kids. The middle class simply kick them out of most consensual mating market.

That makes gene pool survival game a kill or be killed situation. Fair solutions where you pick women freely and afford kids you make are simply unavailable.

The losers are the one getting screwed by the liberal for paying someone else’ kids, or get stuck in conservative marriage hell. The winners are the one knocking out many chicks or someone else’s wife or be a sperm donor and forget about the kids.

So to win in gene pool survival game, you need to be a jerk. Those who aim to be fair like libertarian will be losers. Women prefer winners. For now, that means women prefer jerks.

Gene pool survival is then like trying to get rich in a communist country where wealth disparity is politically incorrect. You can do that. But being nice, honest, and productive is just not the way.

The same way reproductive and mate acquisition success disparity is politically incorrect. You can be successful but being nice, honest, and productive is just not the way.

Nothing is fair, and hence, all is fair, in love and war. That explains the maxims.

I still do not want to marry TO5 or anyone. But things don’t work out with TO1. I spent too much time thinking all these that Biz went tits up. TO5 works things out with my parents.

I was very confused fearing extinction, ended up marrying her. TO5, arranges everything with my parent, and I reluctantly marry her.

Well, it’s a well thought of decision actually. I searched for most alternatives, but all are illegal or politically incorrect. I should have just cohabits with TO5.

There is no alimony law in my country and my future short term expected income was low. Within marriage government will have a way to say I am evil.

Outside marriage, they will still have many ways to say I am evil. If all reasons are used up, they can always say God says so and that they believe it because of faith. That settles lots of arguments.

The first 3 years of marriage, I didn’t feel like making money. I hate the fact that I had to give half of it to her latter once I got a divorce.

It’s 7 years ago. Things are finally working out again. I rebuilt my biz grudgingly to be even bigger. I learn some morals though.

1. Other males are far more aggressive than I am in getting girls and laws are often on their side because they make those laws. I should be a jerk too.

2. When you’re wrong and cornered, hit back. Enemies will be too busy defending they will stop attacking you. Satanists are right that the world is for the bold. Be bold and take chances when you sense weakness and smell blood.

3. If you treat women as almighty goddesses, you’ll offer her nothing, because goddesses need nothing right? And you’ll lose her, and she’ll never really have a choice. However if you see beautiful girls as walking cunts and breeding tools, you will build a mutual understanding. Then maybe you can work something out. Unlike almighty goddesses, walking cunts got need they can’t fulfill without you. Most of them are not as smart, strong and rich as you. Of course if she is superior to you in every way, why would she choose you? And obviously, most importantly, all kids’ generators need the best genes for their breeding mechanism and cash for the kids.

4. I should never be above my enemies or competitors. What ever they throw at me and get away with it means its part of the game. Of course, being smarter, I can hit harder. Far harder. In fact, it’s mandatory that I hit harder. I am genetically hardwired to hit back because for millions of years, my ancestors survive in the gene pool because they hit back. I know because I inherit their genetically hardwired preference to hit back. I should learn to trust my emotion more. Ten years ago one vermin stole $3k from me. Till today, every Christmas, hundreds of thousands of vermin’s conviction records are all over the net. Never let less capable vermin outdone you in evil.

5. Anyone opposing free fair competition should be exterminated as retaliation against vermin bitching against free competition. What I mean extermination, I don’t mean killing. Free fair competition will get rid the inferior anyway. But should they choose to play tough, we should be ready. Remember, many vermin are not above fraud, killing or extermination. Nor shouldn’t we.

6. Many people would say that many offers to girls are offensive. Those girls are not whores, etc. Well, make the offers anyway, and see how she chooses. Give her choices. She can always reject if she doesn’t like it.

7. Everything, everything is part of the game. Everyone has only one person to blame for his missery and fortune. Himself. Make sure you hit harder to your enemy and nicer to your friends. Make sure your employees are productive so you can pay them 2 times their market price. Even that, still understand, that your life do depend on their decisions, and that nothing is sure. Any vermin that you squash, for example, can do a last ditch suicidal move against you. Any friends that you trust can back stab you. It’s up to them. Guess what? It’s still your responsibility. Life is like chess. Your opponent choose to check mate you doesn’t mean it’s not your fault right?

8. Everyone maximizes profit in all area of life. So laws and norms are there to serve the interest of whoever makes those norms. Yes, humans create norms, as game theory or evolutionay psychology said. Not God, or any libertarian logic. Quite understandably most males and females don’t care whether sex is consensual or not. Their main concern is whether a norm will improve their chance of getting mates they want or not. So it’s useless to argue that prostitution and women trafficking are consensual. It’s simply not to the best interest of ugly women and middle class males to legalize it. If you want to change it you need to understand it.

9. Always listen, and listen only to what your target market want. Ugly feminazis often insisted that women are not sex object. Are they your target market? No. So who care? Listening to those who are not your target market can make you generalize and misunderstood the need of those who indeed are your target market. Mistaking the need of those who are not your target market carry no penalty whatsoever under libertarian society. Mistaking the need of your target market is fatal. Many beautiful girls do not mind and are actually happy to be sex objects. Listen to such girls, and only such girls, because those are the only ones that matters. Ignore the rest. In non libertarian societies, those who are not your target market may want to be influential anyway through force. Well, force is then part of the game then right? Look at rule #4. Otherwise #9 and #8 would be a contradiction.

10. IQ is fine for Math. But to truly survive in the gene pool you need to follow your emotion. Your emotion is filled with lots of hard wired algorithms to survive in the gene pool.

Do Women Care if We Love Her and Respect Her?

When they choose who they want to mate with?

Despite what everyone else said about what women want, I have never met yet one beautiful girl that seems to care whether I love her or not. They choose me anyway even though I repeatedly say I don’t love her, I do not want to get married, I hate marriage, etc. That despite they have other males stalking her professing love, etc.

Why offer what target market do not want?

I may be wrong. If they really care, then I would introduce them to those that provide those kind of love. It’s just that no body seems to care.

Not that I want women that do not want me anyway. In fact, I often introduce women to other rich, handsome, tall, and smart guys. It’s a good way to maintain good relationship. Can’t catch them all anyway.

Exactly like what evolution theory predicts.

I planned to get laid for free actually as I often did:)

I am just trying to straighten up some knee jerks opinion people have about me.

I am quite old now and feel like settling down and enlarging biz. But no, I got to go back to my dream. Yap. I got to sleep with lots of chicks and then donate sperms to thousands. That’s my main goal in life now.

In fact, the higher class the girl, the more likely she’ll do it for free. I slept with a beautiful girl with a steady income as top sellers insurance real estate. Unfortunately my biz went tits up 3 years ago and she demanded marriage. Wealth goes up, cost go down and via versa. That’s another rule I learn.

I do not mind paying. However, I prefer girls wanting my cock rather than my money. In fact, I explicitly said that to my gf before she bitches about marrying Sad.

And no I am not mad at gdb. I felt exactly the same way toward men like me (pro polygamy, promiscuous men) when I was young. The difference between you and I is that I stuck to my principles, paid dearly for that and realized I was simply wrong. A very long story. Quite painful actually.

All this time we see men with many women. What’s their secret? I thought no women want to share. Must be something insidious. Well, there is indeed a secret. It’s not that complicated. It’s not insidious. But that’s the issue. It’s a secret.

Quietly hidden behind layers and layers of indoctrination and censorship. When somebody says something that might disclose of the truth, horde of people would get “offended”. The truth, will be declared offensive. Whatever the mass believe are effectively true because such belief often has ways to perpetuate itself.

I am the only one from my family with children. My 2 brothers do not have wife yet. My beautiful female cousin made $4k/month and also don’t get married. While some jerk just marry some women and leave her with debt and kids. I am losing gene pool survival game at this rate, and so is all of you.

The issue is not that women don’t want to do it for free. They can’t. In most cases, only rich women can afford “free sex”.

And what’s most males’ money for if not to make women that choose you happy + raising children? Actually there is another less efficient use. To impress women. That’s why men spend a lot of money not on women, but on expensive cars and big houses. Women like to sleep, often for free, with men with such assets.

So the idea that if you have money you got to “force” women to get laid is simply very wrong. However, that’s the kind of idea people have. Consensual become non consensual and the alternative, which is effectively forced, count as consensual.

The 4 ways to pay for kids.
1. Marriage, heavily regulated
2. Child support, also heavily regulated (but the least bad in my opinion). You don’t need to put contract, and yea, 10% of your income is not that much. This one is what drives marriage out.
3. Welfare. Un libertarian
4. Women work. Most women that work, don’t survive well in the gene pool.

To be frank, I am not desperate to get laid. I want to wait till I am a millionaire first before becoming a father. I think if all males are like that there will be no poverty. However, I also know that even after I become a millionaire, I won’t get a lot unless I start early.

While someone else that’s far less financially responsible for me will get a lot. So that left only one choice. Join them. Get laid early.

Soon, I will join another seminar on how to get laid with friends. But most of us know we can get high quality girls for free if we really try. As for getting girls and pay for it, that one is already obvious. Striptease with 16 girls are only $10 in Indonesia.

The irony is, the reason why the price is so cheap is because all those laws protecting women. If not because of those norms, I bet my current wife would have picked Tom Cruise.

What I Mean by Women=Sex Object


This guy says that clearly. I feel like I am putting women above men actually. You guys think the opposite.

Let me restate that clearly. Under libertarian principle, women will RULE the world precisely because they’re sex object. Under libertarian principle, those who own something everybody want will rule the world. Man want women. Is that clear? Obviously it’s not happening too easily. After all, males rule the world, mainly through force and fraud right? Women neither own or control their body. They just think they are.

Well, to be honest, I used to think like you. We are all indoctrinated to think that women=sex object somehow demean women. I think that misconception is the heart of all bigger government, poverty, etc.

While demeans are not really a scientific term and it’s hard to argue about it, interests are quite scientific. We can observe what people choose when they have legal (or effectively legal) choice. It’s science folks. Keep that in mind.

Mama Liberty, what do you think?

Here is a quote:
“For a man to walk into a bar and have his choice of any woman he wants, he would have to be the ruler of the world. For a woman to have the same power over men, she’d have to do her hair.” -Bill Maher

Women don’t rule the world, because they never have to.

Here is another article:

“Would you rather be the second or third wife of Mel Gibson or the only wife of Willard Scott?”, to which one of the panelists, the conservative commentator and activist Susan Carpenter McMillan, responded, “If it comes to Mel Gibson, I wouldn’t care if I was one, two, or three.”

The battle between creationist and those supporting evolution theory is just started. However, those 2 articles will be what the mainstream religions will be.

Evolution Theory, Right, and Effective Right

Guys, the article is joking. That guy don’t really suggest anything. He’s just trying to show what evolution theory, which is a disprovable theory of life is all about to common folks. He’s trying to show how absurd socialized health care is.

He, like me, tries to help you understand life the way IT IS, not the way it SHOULD BE.

GDP, I agree with you about right. I was and may still be a libertarian. But you’re not on scientific realm. You’re on ideological realm. It’s 2 different things okay.

As about me, I think you just have too much knee jerk reaction. I already got 2 kids with one of the most beautiful girls in my high school. I am just sad I got only 1 beautiful girl instead of all 5. Yes there are other pretty women that says they want me too, with sufficient financial arrangement. I introduced them to someone else instead to spread the joy.

I NEVER said women has to have sex with me. If no body wants me, I would peacefully play video game till the day I die. No hard feeling. In fact, even if a woman wants me things may still not work out, and I would politely show her some other males richer than I am. No hard feeling.

What I disagree with is others’ so called “right” or power preventing rich people from consensually mating. Such is the case of prohibition of various of virtually all consensual acts, namely to get rid competitors.

Recently, in my country, a bunch terrorist demand government to prevent some porn star from coming to Indonesia. They said, like you always said, it demeans women. Well, that’s the kind of thing I disagree.

I think women have right to be a porn star and to show up in porn, irrelevant of what others feel. I also understand that women EFFECTIVELY don’t have that right. Effective right comes from power and women don’t have the guts and power to fight for their right. Why you keep deliberately misunderstanding me does puzzles me though.

And if you say money doesn’t matter and no beautiful girls are willing to have sex just for money, well…. Maybe not in US. Nah… I doubt even that. Let’s just say money is not my main selling point. Girls have been hitting over me when I was poor. I just feel I can get even more.

Right comes from productivity is in theory.
Another theory is right comes from God.

What it really means is some people believe that right SHOULD comes from productivity or from God. That’s it. That’s all. It’s just an idea. An idea that greatly affect our life. But that’s not reality. It’s not science.

I have a right over my property. Then a thief stole it. Then government didn’t bother chasing that vermin. Then what? It’s my property. My right. Then what? Then the thief is wrong? So what? Your concept of right, is just a theory.

It’s time to stop becoming too theoretical here.

A self fulfilling theory I hope. I am trying to tell you how stuff really works in reality so we can make your theory, a reality.

I am saying right as in effective right.

That one comes from the front of gun barrel or something like Lenin said.

Look the rich knows something about making money, the politician knows something about politic okay Smiley

As girls as objects. Everyone is an object. That’s the hard of objectivitism isn’t it? Everything is an object. I think an objectivist himself said that somewhere. Beautiful girls (not all girls) are sex objects, as much as Michael Jordan is a basket ball player, and as much as meat sellers are effectively meat vending machines. What is so wrong about that? Yea they have right not to be the label we put them too. Then what? Would they bother?

If people call me programming object, I don’t get mad. I am proud because that’s what I am good at. That doesn’t imply I am not a human being with right. It simply means I am a good programmer. A DAMN good one. How come people get mad when I called women sex object?

You talk about girls that do not want to be called sex objects. What about girls that want to? What about girls that want to be sex objects? Where are their right?

Where is mother Loraine? Loraine? We got a break down of communication here. As some ex beautiful girl, can you help straighten things up?

Should We Force All Countries to Become Democracies?

Recently Indonesian government demand that Jogja Governer should be elected.

As of now, the descendant of ancient Jogja King is always the governor. He disagree. That one is not very surprising. Here is what’s surprising. Most Jogjan diagrees too.

Jogjakarta, which is the only monarch within Indonesia is the most free, most liberal, and one of the most economically advance regions in Indonesia. That king, so far, governed well. Not to mention that the king supported Indonesian’s independence against the dutch. There would be no Indonesia without Jogja monarch and now a country that the kingdom help build will destroy it.

I lived in Jakarta, which is the capital, and I feel like stealing money because all the money often has to go through Jakarta first.

However, Jogja is prosperous despite not being the capital.

How come that one monarch govern his country well beyond the other democratically elected regions?

Well, democracy has plus and minus. The plus is people are not too stupid. We don’t need a smart government, we need something that’s not too stupid and democracy sort of works. Another plus is you don’t get more power simply because you’re more violent. That greatly demotivate people from usurping the thrones by, say, civil war. Of course there are many pluses on democracy. We always get a top dog for the executive branch rather than idiots that happen to be the son of the last emperor is another thing.

No system is perfect.

Democracy is ruled by whoever make the most kids. We know how that leads to in US. That’s a serious misalignment of interest.

What about immigration? Imagine. Say I am a socialist, then I come to US for job, then I vote for socialism. What will happen? I effectively got a “stake” on a country by simply coming there. That’s what democracy is right? Voting right for population (not citizenship). Yea in US you got to be citizen first, but there is a strong pressure to turn anyone there into citizen as if it’s their right. No wonder well managed countries then counter that with another inefficient strategy, preventing immigration. Now I am not saying it’s right. But sometimes there is a deeper problem that should be cured first before we cure symptoms.

Dubai do not have that problem. 80% of Dubai population do not have citizenship. Is Dubai bad? Well those workers get paid more do they? Because those immigrants will never rule Dubai’s ruling sultan never has problems with allowing them to come in.

What about Jogja? Well there is a reason why Indonesians are not very rich yet. Most of the people stupidly opposes individual freedom.

If Jogja becomes democracy, Jogja’s prosperity would simply attract a lot of people. Most of those people do not like freedom as much as Jogja’s citizen. Then those people can vote. Jogja then will become just like every other region in Indonesia.

However, if Jogja is still a monarch, people that come to Jogja will not have power to change the status quo of freedom. Jogja will still be prosperous. Other regions will then follow. Those who do come to Jogja will be those who like the way the king govern. Which is another important point. You don’t like it, well just move out.

The same issue is happening in Bali. Balinese do not like muslim immigrants. Why? Well Australian tourists are sunbathing totally naked in Bali. The balinese do not mind at all. After all they get paid a lot and those tourists are their main income. Also those female white tourists are quite hot. I wouldn’t complain here.

Like Jogja, Bali is one of the most prosperous region in Indonesia.. Then prosperity attract Javanese in large number. Then the muslims refer to Indonesian laws against pornography demands those tourists to wear thongs.

I got nothing against Muslims and Javanese. It’s just that as long as we’re richer, they should be more like us than the other way around. Democracy combined with lax immigration, could result in things going the other way around.

Women Are Sex Objects as Sure as Michael Jordan is a Basket Ball Player

Fair enough. I just feel funny when I said that and curious about your reaction would be.

This really should be another topic.

NEVER in this forum or anywhere I said women shouldn’t have gun or shouldn’t choose for her life. In fact, I would encourage it. She has right for her body, I have right for my cash. That’s it. Fair enough? Women, especially ugly women, shouldn’t have right to interfere on how I would spend my money consensually. That’s violating my right there. Clear?

If some women do not want to be seen as sex object, then fine. Most of the time, I would stay away from them and they would stay away from me. No problem. No biggy. They can hang around with other wush… (I mean morally upright politically correct effeminate) males.

Also I do not mean being sex object is a bad thing. Hot women are sex object as sure as Michael Jordan is a basket ball player. Of course, Michael can play baseball too. It’s just that baseball is not how he mainly add values to the market. When women can be sex object, they will be above males. What other jobs you get paid so well doing something you already know without training? More money, more power. What is so bad with that?

No body has a right to force anyone to change his mind. It’s like freedom of religion. People held far more unreasonable beliefs than I am based on faith. We tolerate that. I think the way feminazis want people to stop thinking women as sex object is beyond consensual persuasion.

Not allowing employer to propose groping hot employee is also wrong. It’s force and that’s wrong. If all males want to think women as sex objects, it’s males’ right. Women also have plenty of stupid idea and we let them think freely right?

By the way, I think it’s time you guys start growing balls and think outside the box those feminazis enclosed you. Again, I can’t force you.

Also I don’t expect you will change your mind. It’s hardwired in your gene. I read something about white people that’s you probably disagree. Capitalism is not really white’s trade mark. Ming dinasty is capitalistic too and the Chinese often has the smallest government. If there is anything unique about Europeans is their (Ayn Rand will disagree with me on this) sense of equality and their respect toward women. Democracy (equal power for everyone), Monogamy (equal reproductive success for everyone), and socialism (equal wealth for everyone) are all made in Europe. As if something is wrong if one guy is ubber alles.

As a capitalist that believe in meritocracy, I think that’s bad. But what can I say? You’re the most advance civilization for now. Maybe I am wrong.

The essence of my idea is that all prohibition against consensual act is bad because it’s effectively a market distortion that misproperly align people’s interest toward productivity. I believe government regulation on sex and reproduction is the BIGGEST market distortion and hence the one should be fought most.

I don’t believe your genes decide your productivity. I know plenty of poor high IQ people and rich low IQ people. People used to say the Jews, Black, Asians, Non White, Jin, Roma, Armenian, Palestinians, Arabs, Chinks, as inferior. Well fine. They have a right for their opinion, while I disagree of course. My say is, let them proof it. Let the market decide. I am sure, the market will show that eventually, it’s individuals rather than their ethnic that’ll give wealth to those who are productive. I may be wrong. Whatever that maybe, let the market decide.

Commercialization (which is 90% of libertarianism according to Madonna in “Material Girl”) has motivate males (and a lot of women) to be diligent, industrious, and productive. But wealth means little if someone else decides what we can buy with our wealth, which is what happens now due to many restrictions. Why not allow males to buy what most males truly want? Sexual service from beautiful girls. I am sure motivation to be wealthy will be much more and we will get even richer.

Marriage, and monogamy, when non consensually enforced through governments’ restriction, is simply the biggest market distortion. It’s far more dangerous than income tax, welfare program, tariff, and trades.

Free market has improved our computer speed by 2 every 5 years. Free market have improved our wealth. Free market have improved our standard of living. Guess what? All those achievement will go to whoever make most kids. Wealth distribution, redistribution, crime, genocide, or simply marriage and inheritance, ALL will go to those who make kids. When you inherit your wealth, the kid is only (at most) half yours right?

So why not extend free market to what truly matters, reproduction. Let the market decide who breed. Commercialization of computer makes computer faster. Commercialization of sex makes the productive more breed more.

Are Women Just Sex Objects?

Are women sex object? Why not let the market decide. How much money a prostitute make? How much money she would have made if she insisted on being a programmer and compete with males without help from affirmative action. Profit maximization principles means you are, or will become, what the market value you most for, quite obviously.

Believe it or not, I actually value others more as persons that most people. It’s just that I do it out of choice if I care about others. I have no obligation to care about others beyond what I need to provide them so they give me what I WANT.

I paid my employees way above market price, because they’re human. I made a biz not just for me but for humans around me. Do I have to do so? No. Not under capitalism. I go above and beyond because I choose to. Because I feel like I care. Because they’ve been good to me. I have no obligation to go above and beyond that, but I choose to do so anyway. The same way if one day I see women as something more than sex object, it would be because I choose to.

Some women sell their name card design to me and a member of mensa. Okay, she’s more than sex object that. She is a friend (one of a few that understand me). But it’s my right to decide what she is for me. Obviously if I insist that she’s nothing more than sex object then I won’t have a great name card design, but it’s my choice.

It’s the bigots that don’t see people as people and hence don’t deserve to be treated as people.

The essence of libertarianism is we have a right to hang out with and ONLY with those we please for the purpose and ONLY for the purpose we please.

Women are sex object, at least for me, as much as meat sellers are meat sources. Obviously there are more than meat selling behind those meat sellers. Maybe he has a family. Maybe he wants some vacation. Maybe one day I care. However, as a sovereign individuals I have the absolute right to see people as their interface that fit my goals and nothing beyond that. Most of the time, I see meat sellers, as meat sellers. People matters to me as much as how they are useful to me and not much more.

C’mon. Do you ever visit a homeless person? Maybe you do, but unlikely. Those are none of your biz. Do you cry when your landlord’s son died? Maybe you do especially if the landlord is chinese that pay anyone to cry on their funeral. I am not even sure we, Chinese, do that anymore.

To us, landlords are just housing provider, which we pay for it, and that’s it.

The same way, women’s non sex object aspect is beyond of my concern. Unless they’re good at programming, but most of pretty ones are not and I don’t like working with ugly women. It’s my right to offer women (and looks like in my country I still have that right), to say that they can work for me if I can grope her all over. It’s a fair offer. She doesn’t like it, she can refuse. But it’s my right to give that offer and her right to accept that.

If I want to see women as only sex object, it’s my right. If the women do not like that, it’s also their right. It’s also her right to stay away from people like me, obviously, but the number of women that find such offers offensive is not as many as you think.

What enrage me is if some hot women don’t mind being my sex object and some other people bitch about it. In fact, that’s why I hate marriage so much. A beautiful girl I like cannot divorce her husband because her husband disagree. Yes you said the girl agreed to get married. But virtually all alternatives and information about alternatives are illegal. Not to mention so many material marriage terms are not explicitly said. At the least, there is nothing libertarianly wrong with trying to persuade people from getting married in the first place. Marriage is declining anyway.

I used to think that feminists are my allies. That’s because I know real reason behind marriage is to ration females in equal share for everyone. After I meet you guys, I see that things work differently in rich countries. The males are rich enough to attract mates. It’s the women that oppose freedom. Doesn’t matter. Libertarianism means you choose what you choose independent of others’ will. The only way people can have a hard bargaining position to “compel” you to do what they want is if they offer you something YOU WANT.

If they have nothing I want, they’re most likely nothing to me. Also aspects of their life beyond what I WANT means nothing for me, unless I want to use it to get what I want.

Religions as Views of Their Members

Religions are often just views of their members. Different members have different prejudice and hence interpret things differently.

Jews tend to think “love thy neighbor as thy self” to mean we should be “fair”

And Christian tends to think that to mean charity. This seems to be motivated by desire to accuse those who are rich as wrong.

Business, under capitalism, is not only fair, but is actually quite merciful.

Under capitalism, we acquire land through buying. Yet, morally superior people would call land, holy land, which justifies, holy war, and holy lies, and holy rocket, and holy bombing, and holy this and holy that, creating conflicts of a century.

Let everything be governed under capitalistic principle and we’re all be better of.