Free access to scriptures religious leaders try to censor
- The first one is from Britney Spears. She offered me a job for having sex with her regularly.
- The second one is from US government. They want me to fight some Taliban in the Afghanistan or something.
The pay is about the same.
Which one you will choose?
Which one most males would choose?
Which one would most females on equivalent situation will choose?
So why do feminists want women to be able to pick the 2nd option but not the first again?
Now let’s use feminazis logic:
Receiving cash for sex is prostitution. Prostitution is so degrading, inhuman, and can’t possibly be consensual. No women can truly consent to prostitution. Because men and women are the same, no men could possibly want it.
The latter seems better. It’s every feminists wet dream jobs. Feminists have been fighting so hard to be able to get the second job, it must be very good. It brings honors, respects, equality, yada yada yada… Not to mention the glorious possibility of honorably being tortured to death for ones’ country.
What do you think?
If I just follow my feeling, I’ll pick the #1. But all (feminist) logic says #2 is better.
Should you ever listen to feminist advice?