We need More Competition Among States

Free access to scriptures religious leaders try to censor


This is why we need competition among states.

While federal income tax tend to hurt the rich, state tax tend to hurt the poor hence freeing rich people. And the reason why is obvious.

Rich people can simply move to another state much more easily than the poor. So of course they are taxed less. However, that’s not the only good things about competition among states.

Countries are competing too.

Hence, I expect more and more tax can be shoved down back to those evil commies that asked for it.

We need more capitalism and making states compete in globalization is the best way to do so.

Solution of Poverty

The solution of poverty is very simple. There are poor people in US. Those who slip through the crack. But those are rare right? With minimum wage of $10 anyone can just work, live with their parents, and buy bitcoin or play axie infinity or create a start up if he has high IQ and rich parents.

Only 60% of American males are fathers.

Think about it 40% are not fathers anyway. Imagine if the 60% that are fathers are also the richest. That means no need for welfare enough.

I am pretty sure top 60% of all Americans can afford raising children. We’re talking about top 60% here. Every kid have reasonably rich father.

That’ll eliminate poverty like ice cubes in hell.

The 40%? Well they go extinct. They don’t bequeath their lack of business talent, common sense, IQ to their children.

Poverty will be very low. So, less welfare, less tax.

But what about if women prefer the poor? Yea, it’s the women’s choice. Why should tax payers be responsible for women stupidly choosing poor guys as father for their children.

Would you want to support women that don’t choose you and her children?

Are you a cuckold? It’s her right to choose some other guys but money comes with the cock. It’s the corner stone of justice and fairness in all civilization since time immemorial.

But why the 60% that are fathers are not the richest 60%? Many reason. Excessive child support law is one of them. Welfare encouraging the bottom 40% to be father is another.

Just get rid of it. Instead, reward everyone not to have children and make rich people pay child tax and head tax. The rich will have children anyway and pay those child tax.

I would suggest this in my country, but we don’t have welfare, so things are already working out. I love capitalism. Socialism causes poverty, and poverty means no welfare, and we got capitalism.

Meritocracy or Diversity?

Some people believe in meritocracy. Hire people based on merit and only on merit. Use standardized test scores.

Another want diversity. Hire women or blacks.

Of course there are people that want to hire only white or whatever, however those are far beyond normal I never hear them in Mensa Firehouse or any mensa forum.


Here a journal is shelved for not promoting diversity. People don’t debate it. People don’t make rebuttal. No. The journal is just shelved.

Sometimes I wonder, which one will produce more result, and when?
Meritocracy or diversity?

When there is government enforcing certain values, obviously the value favored by the government would prevail.

For example, if the government favor hiring women, then company that hire strictly based on merit may not get government contract. That affects profit.

But what about crypto businesses? What about war? There is no “God” above or government that have any value.

Western government is pro women and against men.

Men are more likely to pay tax and less likely to receive benefit in western countries. I’ve heard there are shelters for women but no shelters for men. Single mothers are treated better than single fathers.

But well. It’s men that fight war. It’s men that win war.

The Taliban is on the other extreme. They just turn women into sex slaves for men that fight for them.

Not that I am advocating it. But well, they won didn’t they?

Why would men fight for a system that discriminate against them? Why would men die for someone else’s wives’ and children?

I am disgusted with welfare because I wouldn’t want my tax money to fund my competitors’ welfare.

Warriors switch side in Afganistan. Rich businessmen reincorporate in tax haven. At the end, on top of governments and their laws, we have natural laws and competition that no body can change.

And it makes me wonder how long will western civilization last if it stops being meritocratic?

When they see greed and selfishness not as something to be properly aligned for mutual benefit but as something wrong that needs to be squashed.

They are rich, but they don’t produce as many children as Islam. What’s the point of being rich if money go to others’ children?

Would ideology, that’s say cruel, evil, but benefit men take over? Time will tell.

Why Bill Gates is a Better Person Than Mother Theresa

I remember having a talk with my professor or some christians how I think Bill Gates is better than Mother Theresa.

They are surprised with the idea. They said that Bill Gates doesn’t sacrifice himself and hence don’t move his emotion.

I was like, why is this guy emotion moved by sacrifice? Is this some hidden racism like bigotry that make him happy if people suffer? Is he a sadist?

I told them that Bill Gates contribute a lot to the economy. He employs lots of people. He makes computer cheap with his open architecture strategy.

We are typing in facebook in PC because of him.

At that time, I didn’t take into account his philanthropy. I think his philanthropy is bad unless done to avoid tax.

But boy. If I know the full story, I would have known how correct I was.

If Mother Theresa is a saint, we are all saint and Bill Gates is super saint.

Thinking otherwise is bigotry against rich productive people and blasphemy against capitalism.


Selfishness in Action

Corrupt governments be like:

Most humans are selfish. Not only most humans are selfish, they are more selfish than capitalists. At least capitalists tend to want win win solution.

How do I make better product so I make more money. But most humans, especially politicians don’t care and just want money at expense of others.

Hence, the nature or resources allocation when the government have a lot of say is like this.

I guess I have to learn to be hypocrites.

Inconsistent Morality

Ever think that a moral reasoning sometimes make sense, however, applied inconsistently.

For example, someone criticize christianity, or ask christians to bake cakes for gay. But he doesn’t do that to muslims. Here, the moral reasoning may make sense. Why discriminate against gay? However the inconsistencies of how it is applied make things suspicious.

Another sample is the idea that jews must return land stolen during 6 days war to palestines. While the moral reasoning may make sense. You shouldn’t take others’ land, it’s kind of stranget that only jews must do that.

I mean virtually every countries in the world take each other’s land. Even ISIS do that. The life of arabs in israel is already better than the life of jews in palestines.

Or what about the idea that white people have to pay compensation for slavery their ancestors did? That’s despite the fact that so many other cultures practice slavery too. If anything, those white people are the one ending the practice of slavery first.

So what should I, or say, we, when we have issues like this? One way to think about it is that the whole thing is a farce and that’s not the real reason.

The thing with this approach is, it justifies almost everything. Even genocide can be justified given that before and long holocaust there are many other genocide anyway that nobody cares about.

In fact, we owe our current world peace to a system called mutually assured destruction. Basically threat of mass genocide is what keep us line.

Another is to see that the whole moral reasoning is overrated. People do what’s profitable anyway. Also they stick with their allies. Might as well learn politic and forget morality.

Let’s take a look at the case of slavery compensation. Other cultures practice slavery too. However, other cultures are poor. Also in dating apps white men tend to get more women. White men tend to earn a lot of money relative to other cultures.

So the true issue behind slavery compensation is simply marxism where people hate groups that are simply more successful.

Moral reasoning are just ways to sway moderates of those in the middle. This seems a bit cheesy. I like to think like psychopaths and ignore moral. Morality isn’t really science anyway, and hence not worth learning.

What people think as moral is scientific and it is toward our best interests to understand and simply adapt to prevailing moral those in power want, often hypocritically. Yet, this issue kind of bother me.

Gender Discrimination Disappoint My Woke Self

I am sooooooo sad and offended by the idea well into 21st century there are people that think women are not as capable as men in some area of competition and hence shouldn’t compete against men.


I mean why not? We should all be all for equal opportunity and diversity in all area of life.

We should give those womyn a chance to compete against men, real men, in equal settings so they can proof equality of result between gender.

Anyway, what actually happened? They get pregnant during matches? Fans ask for nudes? What? I haven’t read the detail.

Unfair Distribution of Wealth

I think United States is a great country that deserve to be more prosperous.

I am disappointed with the unfair distribution of wealth in US though. I think their businessmen and CEOs should have made even more money for being awesome productive people.

I think their low level workers should not have made much more than Indonesian workers. Why should workers with similar IQ and capability earn more or less based on countries they live in?

I could reason that US citizens allow capitalism to flourish more than Indonesians and that’s why they deserve good fortune more than Indonesians.


Okay… I can accept that reasoning.

What about if something is believed, precisely because it’s false

Have you ever thought of something societies believe, precisely because it’s false.

In Poker, for example, people bluff precisely because they have bad card. If they have normal card they don’t raise bets. If they have good cards, they raise bets but that’s not bluffing.

When the flaks are near, the bombers are near target.

People with false beliefs don’t care about the truth. They launch flak and claim certain things are offensive precisely because those things are true.

For example, people say you can’t speak against someone “weak”.

The truth is, you can’t speak against someone, not because that person is weak but because that person is strong. You know who rules you by seeing who you can’t criticize.

So the idea that you can’t speak against, trans, for example, is because trans lobby is so strong that a mere less than 1% of population can make the rest bend over backward.

Or what about, self sacrifice? In my school, this is taught as a virtue. But what do I get if I am willing to sacrifice my self interests? Well, I am not even supposed to question it because that’s the whole point of self sacrifice, you don’t care what you get.

But then again, what do I get? Will people be more nice to me if I am not too selfish? What about if the truth is the opposite. What about if people will be nicer to me if I am selfish. If I am nice, I tend to do things to please people.

If I am selfish, I tend to do things only if it benefits me. So the only way people can motivate me to be beneficial to them is by mutually beneficially trading. When I was young I read a christian tractates. Women that want to be happy shouldn’t pick a rich man and man that want to be happy shouldn’t pick pretty women.

What about the truth is the exact opposite. Your dopamine and serotonin, will spike out if you get high quality sex partners? And that the idea that men shouldn’t aim for pretty women is spoken, precisely because it’s the opposite of what’s true.

We are told to respect women. What about if women actually look down on men that respect her.

We are told that paying women is abusive and men that see women as sex objects hate women. What about if the very reason why people think that way is because many very smart beautiful women like men that pay them and in return, treat them as sex objects?

Anything else? Something is believed precisely because it suggest something that is not true.

Understanding Things Through Motives

When we look at this, it’s pretty obvious of what’s actually happening. For example, the pictures claim that Dinosaurs have sex and then meteor comes. If we see this as “truth” so many things are just absurd. How the hell the author knows that meteor comes because dinosaurs have sex? Also we know all animals have sex pretty much a lot. That’s how all sexual creature reproduce. Do we see higher meteor shower when they have more sex or what?

But if we see the motive behind the picture, things are obvious. Some people do not like sex to be governed by free market and prefer that to be governed by religion or government. So they basically say that you shouldn’t have sex before marriage. And then they made things up. It’s easy for people that do not believe in Christianity, for example, to see how obvious what’s going on is.

However, if you’re inside their bubble, if you’re a Christian, you are confused as hell. Plenty of political rhetoric are like that. Some says bigger government in healthcare will make it cheaper. I bet it doesn’t. Another say welfare decrease poverty. It actually increase it. In fact, most poor people would have gone extinct by starvation if not because of welfare and hence gone. Some are just plain vague.

This is offensive. That is racist.

Again, seeing what do they want and what sort of nonsense they would spew to motivate us to do what they want is a better way to see things. Do you have a sample where you start of inside the bubble and you really get confused? You feel uncomfortable, weird.

Things don’t make sense at all. And then, you start seeing things outside the bubble and things tend to be obvious?

For example. How to get rich. When I was a kid, I thought the way to do it is to study hard and then get a good job and so on and so on. But so many things don’t make sense with the model. Why everyone moves at the same speed even though some just learn faster? Why do I have to learn courses that don’t make money?

Why do I have to memorize names and so on and so on…. And yet everyone acts like everything is fine and I am an idiot for questioning those.

Of course, after reading books like Rich Dad Poor Dad, and Federal Mafia, things start making sense to me. Any similar experience?

May be an image of text that says 'THE DINOSAURS HAD SEX... AND LOOK WHAT HAPPENED TO THEM. ABSTINENCE I go to a Christian college and just walked into a residence hall and am crying laughing'