Which one is faster?
The Flash or a quadriplegic?
The winner get millions of dollars and the losers are killed.
Who can go from 0 to Mach 20 faster? Who can maintain running speed of 1.5c?
Well, that’s obviously the Flash, but what does that have anything to do with being fast?
What about if we just put them in a standard running race. See who win?
You see. It’s complicated.
Such standardized race will only strengthen the privilege of those with faster running parents. We can see this by observing the high correlation between children’s speed at standardized race tests with their parents winning rates in running speed championships.
Obviously there is no causal relationship whatsoever between winning running competition and genetic. Let’s not talk about it okay. It’s privileged. Not genes.
Also 0.00001% of the speedsters win 99.9999 % of running competition. This shows of huge winning gap between super speedsters and underprivilege quadriplegic. It’s a proof of speedster privileges’. This is caused by speedercracy. We got to destroy speedercracy.
Why every runner have to run the same distance? Distance each runners should run should be proportional to their speed. Not reporting speed honestly is speed tax evasion punishable by jail for speed tax fraud.
If we just let people that finish first win, we are only encouraging people to greedily and selfishly running as fast as possible without caring of those they left behind.
Why should people run as fast as possible? We should treat each runner equally. People should spend the same time for each meter travelled.
So people should spend 1 year for first meter, and another year for 2nd meter, and so on. People should reach their distance traveled based on their age appropriate location.
Why is it controversial those demographic groups that tend to run faster win more running championship? What? You don’t believe in winning gaps? You are slowgynist. Why do you hate slow people?
Some motorbikers self identify as normal runners. Not respecting the identity they chose is disrespectful. So we should allow them to compete. The same with those using bullet trains.
Yes, adjusted for running speed, those who run faster tend to win more running championship. However, people with chess hairs are more likely (or less likely, I haven’t really checked) to be a speedster. Hence, measuring people speed in a race is chesshairists. That’s bigotry.
Some minority groups like quadriplegic are so under priviliged that we need to give them extra starting distance to compensate for unfair structural speedocracy in all running race. The extra start distance should be enough to put them beyond the finish line at the start of the race.
Simply using leg muscles to run is disrespectful of distance.
I don’t believe in equality of result. I do think we should have equality of chance. Do you think the Flash have equal chance to win against the quadriplegic on normal standardized race? Statistics and betting odds show otherwise.
No runner is left behind.
Real runners smell the flowers.
Finally, under the new rules that ensure some sense of equality between the Flash and the quadriplegic, the quadriplegic won the race. Well, none of those rules get in the way.
Perhaps, the Flash doesn’t want to win.
Until, today, we have no idea who is faster. The Flash or the quadriplegic.
Meanwhile, someone ask another question.
Which one can produce more children and economically contribute more to the world? Elon Musk or some cavemen in Afghanistan?
Which one have better technology, IQ, and business talents? Which one is richer? Which one can more easily persuade or pay women to give him children.
None of those have anything to do with ability to produce children and contribute economically.
The winner become the future of humanity, the loser go extinct.
Why don’t we just let the market decide?
Why? Why not?