Should You Aim for Women that Like you or Women that Give you Result

Free access to scriptures religious leaders try to censor

If you do business, do you want sincere persons or do you want people that do results? Both are important of course. However, if you want sincere persons, it’s tough. You never know if a person is sincere or not.

If you want result, it’s easier. You just verify you got the results and pay for it.

The catch is, if you don’t care too much about honesty and care about results, you often end up with sincere people. That’s because sincere people want to be judged by result. Actually that’s how capitalism works.

Capitalism judge people by results. However, if you want sincerity, you often don’t guard your back and get backstabbed. Then you have to think if if the guy backstabbed you out of misunderstanding or out of malice. Too complicated.

The same way with women. Do you want women that like and love you or women that fuck you and give you biological children cost effectively? Both are important.

However, you can’t know whether a woman like you or love you. You can know whether she gives you children or not. You can know that by doing paternity tests.

You can also verify whether she has sex with you or not. You can also verify how much she is charging you for it. So by keeping things transactional you

  1. Get girls that like you more
  2. Motivate girls to like you. At least now she knows you’re a fair person that reward performance.

Basically by judging people based on result and ignoring what we cannot verify, is he honest, does she like me, you get both result and proper motivations.

Why Land Taxes Should be High

Real life Up
https://9gag.com/gag/aegbB0b

This is why land taxes should be very high.

If someone wants to do something productive with something, no body should get in the way. Each resources should be used to maxed out economic productivity.

This old lady have no reasonable use of the high price property.

Now they build a mall around it and the house worth more. People get rewarded for getting in the way of economy.

Land is not like other’s property. No body creates it. The value comes from the community and infrastructure around it. So land taxes, unlike income tax, can be very fair.

Good Relationship is Like Uber

Not only small trustless capitalistic transactions are the best way to build human relationship, most interactions are actually transactional.

Most are just bad and are effectively a trap. Most arrangements are open to abuses and fraud.If we see transactions as anything we do to convince people to do what we want with incentive, almost everything is transactional.

A gun in your head saying give me your wallet is a transaction. Your life in exchange of your wallet. Of course your wallet is within your right and hence it’s not consensual legally or from libertarian points of view but that’s another story.

Don’t sin and go to heaven is a transaction. Of course, the transaction is mainly in managing expectation because whether you do go to heaven or not is impossible, if not hard to verify.

When results or outcomes are hard to verify, regret minimization algorithm don’t work.

Obey the laws and don’t go to jail is in a sense transaction too. Transactions with too many games to play.

Till death do us part, for better or worse, in sickness and in health, I will love you with everything on my heart is a transaction. It’s a very bad transaction.

What am I actually getting from this? Sex? Is this conditional or unconditional? If unconditional then I am an idiot if it’s conditional then what’s the condition?

If it’s unclear expect lawyers to make tons of money out of this. It’s variable pay. I am committing something close to my whole resources.

What is the monetary value of my so called “love”? Not clear. Also while it’s not clear, it is a monotonically increasing function of my income. If paying for sex is illegal and this stupid deals is cherished, I expect more women end up picking poor people and get less money.

Also for better or worse means variable pay. Till death do us part is a long term deal and not small.

What are a good transactions?

I think good transactions are like uber.

1. No possibility of scam even if the other sides want to scam. So not counting on morality or people’s willingness to do the job. There are safeguards against scam. In marriage, a woman can leave you fuck milk man and get your money. Such possibility of someone can profitably scam means marriage is to be avoided.

If it is possible, try arrangements where people cannot scam even though it is not toward her best interests not to scam. That’s because people often scam anyway against their best interests because they think making it sucks will motivate you to pay her more money. So make that an impossibility.

2. Small repeat orders. Not one life time commitment. I uses uber, then I uses grab, and then I uses gojek. I like gojek most. But I can switch around any time.

3. Win win. Customers get to where they are and drivers get money.

4. Not only neither side can scam, both sides KNOW they can’t scam. So they don’t even try. They both knows that drivers and passengers can give feedback and report unusual activity.

5. No need for bloated corrupt government system as referee. Disputes can be solved quickly. Also disputes are rare. Little lawyers’ fee. Dispute between drivers and passengers often end up with 1 star rating. Dispute between husbands and wives can cost millions or billions of dollars.

6. Because win win, once people use uber, they use uber again and again. Can be scaled up. The result speaks by itself. 99.99% uber drives are done well. Compared to 30% of marriage.

7.Terms are clear. I get to where I am and drivers get money. Drivers cannot argue that he delivered me if I am 5 km away from destination. A woman can argue that she loves me and that’s why she threatens me if I am with another women. If that is what is love, I just want transactions.

Okay, uber is probably not a good sample. We’re just repeat ordering. But paying for hand job can become paying for giving biological heirs latter. So start with small transactions, build trusts, and do bigger ones.

Start small. Start from yourself. Start now. That’s how relationship works. Start with chatting, IQ tests, hand job, and start by making things win win small from yourself.

Don’t count on her liking you or sincere or anything. Just assume she wants to scam and make sure she can’t and that she knows it.

So why so many are not doing it this way?

So when I said everything should be transactional, I mean everything should be “good” win win small trustless transaction. Everything is already transactional from my points of view.

Small Trustless Capitalistic Transactions

Best relationship is like uber

Not only small trustless capitalistic transactions are the best way to build human relationship, most interactions are actually transactional.

The result speaks by itself. 99.99% uber drives are done well. Compared to 30% of marriage that end up in costly fight that profit lawyers.

Most are just bad and are effectively a trap. Most arrangements are open to abuses and fraud.If we see transactions as anything we do to convince people to do what we want with incentive, almost everything is transactional.

A gun in your head saying give me your wallet is a transaction. Your life in exchange of your wallet. Of course your wallet is within your right and hence it’s not consensual legally or from libertarian points of view but that’s another story.

Don’t sin and go to heaven is a transaction. Of course, the transaction is mainly in managing expectation because whether you do go to heaven or not is impossible, if not hard to verify.

When results or outcomes are hard to verify, regret minimization algorithm don’t work.

Obey the laws and don’t go to jail is in a sense transaction too. Transactions with too many games to play.

Till death do us part, for better or worse, in sickness and in health, I will love you with everything on my heart is a transaction. It’s a very bad transaction.

What am I actually getting from this? Sex? Is this conditional or unconditional? If unconditional then I am an idiot if it’s conditional then what’s the condition?

If it’s unclear expect lawyers to make tons of money out of this. It’s variable pay. I am committing something close to my whole resources.

What is the monetary value of my so called “love”? Not clear. Also while it’s not clear, it is a monotonically increasing function of my income. If paying for sex is illegal and this stupid deals is cherished, I expect more women end up picking poor people and get less money.

Also for better or worse means variable pay. Till death do us part is a long term deal and not small.

What are a good transactions?

I think good transactions are like uber.

  1. No possibility of scam even if the other sides want to scam. So not counting on morality or people’s willingness to do the job. There are safeguards against scam. In marriage, a woman can leave you fuck milk man and get your money. Such possibility of someone can profitably scam means marriage is to be avoided. If it is possible, try arrangements where people cannot scam even though it is not toward her best interests not to scam. That’s because people often scam anyway against their best interests because they think making it sucks will motivate you to pay her more money. So make that an impossibility.
  2. Small repeat orders. Not one life time commitment. I uses uber, then I uses grab, and then I uses gojek. I like gojek most. But I can switch around any time.
  3. Win win. Customers get to where they are and drivers get money.
  4. Not only neither side can scam, both sides KNOW they can’t scam. So they don’t even try. They both knows that drivers and passengers can give feedback and report unusual activity.
  5. No need for bloated corrupt government system as referee. Disputes can be solved quickly. Also disputes are rare. Little lawyers’ fee. Dispute between drivers and passengers often end up with 1 star rating. Dispute between husbands and wives can cost millions or billions of dollars.
  6. Because win win, once people use uber, they use uber again and again. Can be scaled up.
  7. Terms are clear. I get to where I am and drivers get money. Drivers cannot argue that he delivered me if I am 5 km away from destination. A woman can argue that she loves me and that’s why she threatens me if I am with another women. If that is what is love, I just want transactions.

Okay, uber is probably not a good sample. We’re just repeat ordering. But paying for hand job can become paying for giving biological heirs latter. So start with small transactions, build trusts, and do bigger ones.

Start small. Start from yourself. Start now. That’s how relationship works. Start with chatting, IQ tests, hand job, and start by making things win win small from yourself.

Don’t count on her liking you or sincere or anything. Just assume she wants to scam and make sure she can’t and that she knows it.

So why so many are not doing it this way?

So when I said everything should be transactional, I mean everything should be “good” win win small trustless transaction. Everything is already transactional from my points of view

Socialism Bigotry

Before, many jews were forced to go out Germany. The ones remaining were killed.

Now, many companies have to be incorporated overseas to avoid socialism bigotry. The ones remaining are taxed.

And both often prosper outside the place where they are prosecuted.The key for progress is competition among nations and people and corporations keep going to where they are treated best.We need more tax break for corporations.

😢

Or they will leave creating jobs and opportunities somewhere else.

Why Poverty is Women’s and Societies’ Choices

I have disagreement with a woman. In my opinion, while a child can’t choose how rich his parents are, parents have a lot to do with how rich their children will be. Society also have a lot of choice in deciding how rich future children will be.

Because how rich a child is depends on their parents’ choices, society shouldn’t give welfare to poor children because that will encourage poverty.

I also argued that women that simply pick rich guys will have richer kids.

She argues that it is not within the women’s control. What about if the husband simply leave? What about if the husband becomes poor or sick or die? And that is a very interesting issue, especially for me that have been victims of scam a lot when I were younger.

How do we get people to do their part of the deal? What about if they leave, sick, poor or die?

1. Reputation. If I buy from reputable guys, like from Amazon, I know I will get my stuff. Big companies with reputation are more likely to fulfill their roles. The same way, women can choose men with reputation of providing for his children with other women. I.e. Don’t pick single guys.

2. Say I buy bitcoin. Say the price drops. Is it my fault? Should society pay me welfare if my bitcoin price drops? It’s not my fault right bitcoin price fall? Well, there are ways to mitigate risk. Bitcoin is not the only investments I have. I spread investments. I managed risk. A women can also have a few husbands or sugar daddies to help her manage risks. Don’t count on only one.

3. I can also gain financial security by picking a job with constant predictable pay. For example, instead of doing business and get a share of profit, for better or worse, I can ask for say $50k a year. I don’t like it because I like managing risks. But this is also a reasonable option. The same way, women can get a husband or sugar daddy that give fix predictable pay, like $2k a month, instead of “for better or worse, in sickness and in health, and bla bla bla.”. Such terms tend to have variable pays and hence tend carry inherent risks.

4. We can split deals into smaller pieces. One big commitments often fail. What we learn from prisoner dilemma games is that splitting big deals into smaller pieces tend to build trusts allowing people to get deals done. For example, if I buy Big Mac, I don’t commit a contract of buying 1000 big mac a year. I buy one at a time. Women can also pursue similar strategies. Get paid for hand job first, then bdsm, then stripper, then fuck job, then getting knocked up. If a man values a woman enough to pay well for small job, chance is he value her enough to repeat order her for life.

5. Sign a clear and concise contract. Deals where the terms are spelled out tend to be obeyed more than deals with vague terms. Loving each other is a very vague terms. Try to do how much a night of fucking pay deal first. It’s a clear contract where both parties can easily observe how the deals go.

6. If the pay is the same, pick richer guys that spend less of his fortune. For example, Bob lives paycheck to paycheck and offer $3k a month. Charlie is a billionaire that also offer $3k a month. Bob can get fired and stop paying. Charlie is more financially stable and hence is more likely to keep paying.

7. Get paid to stay. Don’t ask for huge severance pay like alimony. Only poor losers would settle for such deals. Pick winners that pay women to stay.

8. Pick guys that other pretty smart women choose. I mean why choose yourself? Pick guys that already have many sugar babies and girlfriends. We watch best seller movies, why do we pick singles? It doesn’t make sense. Chance is guys most girls pick have better genes, healthier, richer, and have good qualities.

Now, compare all those reasonable principles with romantic marriage as defined by most laws in most countries. It’s the exact opposite isn’t it? You see the problem is? We have all these tricks to trick people into really really bad deals where women are more likely to end up with losers. So that’s why I stand with my opinions that poverty happens due to women picking stupid deals encouraged by evil societies.

The Game is Rigged for the Rich

Mainly by socialists wanting to bring down people.

How can poor people be rich?

Graduate faster? Nope. They stop that. Score higher in standardized test? Nope. Stop that too. Lots of movement against using standardized test. Work harder make more money? Income tax.

Most productive ways to make money is so heavily penalized. So what’s working?

This is my strategy so far.

1. Put your kids in reasonable school. Not too bad, not too good. I use cheap private school. Tell your children not to work hard for grades and just graduate. They want equality? Be their equal on the surface.

2. Teach your kids business. Real education is from parents. Kids with good parents have better genes, more money, and better business skills. It’s just fair. Concentrate to help ONLY your children. No other children matter. They are your children’s competitors unless on some unusual circumstances.

3. Read books by Robert Kiyosaki. Rich Dad Poor Dad. A lot of ways of getting rich is by legally avoiding tax.

4. Keep in mind power corrupts and humans are evil and bigots. They will blame successful people for any absurd nonsense imaginable. So do whatever it takes to be out of their control.

5a. Do not let others have power over you unless you really have to. Don’t walk at night alone because someone may have gun over you. Lock your doors so burglars don’t come to your house and put gun on your head. Many would say, it’s the burglars fault. Well. Morally yes. Legally maybe. But you are responsible for your own fate.

People get 5 years for killing people. But those who forget to lock their fences get killed by robbers and most would side with robbers, rioters, and terrorists. Just ask Kyle Rittenhouse.

5b. Natural corollary of 5a. Don’t get married. Why oh why you grant government the power to be the pimp of your cock? Why would you let so many incels that can’t get women or afford children to have a say on how you deal with women. Why would you let your competitors and your enemies to rule you?

If I suggest to jews to pick Hitler as president they will laugh. Why would they pick someone that hate them to have power over them. But that’s what marriage is all about. Having hordes of people that hate you to RULE YOU.

People hating you to get one pretty women want to make sure you won’t ever get another one out of jealousy and bigotry and plain competition.

Do NOT ever get married in democratic country. EVER. Don’t even think.

So many men lost a lot of wealth due to marriage. Don’t even think.

Instead, pay sugar babies to produce heirs. Do NOT let woke and religious bigots to have any say on how you should compensate your women. They will arrange that you should pay your women for LEAVING you.

Also the richer you are the more you have to pay. Most people hate rich people so much they want to punish rich men that manage to “get women”. Child support, alimonies, are all very hostile against the rich.

6. If you want to go extra, follow satanic teaching. Do what you want. Just accept the consequences.

Should you avoid tax,. evade tax, or pay tax? Do what you want. Look around. Is government corrupt enough? Which one is cheaper, bribing some judges cheaper than paying insane tax? Can you do this legally so even if you get caught you won’t go to jail and can “settle” for something? Is tax reasonable that you can just pay off? Do what you want.

If things went south, don’t forget to bring a lot of people with you. Commies do that out of bigotry. Well, capitalists should do. But this should be the last resort.

Remember. Humans are infinitely evil. The way we evolve when we’re not at war we’re in a race. So it’s natural that humans kill each other.

Our ancestors have been that way for countless millenia. Only capitalism, Westphalian principles that force countries to be like capitalists, and nukes, make us prosper now. Before that we ALWAYS kill each other.

Our species need only basic moral to get along just fine. There are only 2 evil in this world. Forcing others and defrauding them. Yet, even this 2 simple rules are broken all the time because humans are sooooooooooooooooooooooo evillllllllllllllll.

Fuck. We got to have nukes just to have peace. Think about it. Nothing else works in keeping our fellow humans from killing us.

Remember, you have obligation to only one GOD, the supreme one, yourself. Everyone else worship their own self. Why shouldn’t you?

Every time they said God wants you to do A, B, C, do you notice that it somehow fit their interests? Aren’t you suspicious that it’s not really “God” behind their speech but their own greed, selfishness, and bigotry? Worshipping any other gods will simply make you do others’ bidding for free.

Note: All these are strategies for men. I know, it’s kind of complex. Living as a man is hard. That is why most mensans, CEOs, and military leaders are men. Dumb weak men get slaughtered and produce less children. We just have to eat red pill and see the world the way it really is.

Be a man. That means best or bust. Be somebody or nobody. Get many women or be incels. Rules or be ruled. Kill or be killed. Served or be servants. It’s just situation most men are used to.

I realized this a lot a few years ago. Just embrace manliness. It’s just what life as a man is. Have power in your hand so you can coerce other men to respect what you claim is right.

Do that and be like Gengish Khan, fathering thousands of children. Fail to do so and be one of his victims. It’s just a matter of time.

Women can be very smart too. But being rich, smart, wealthy, and powerful don’t make them have more children. Hence, super smart, wealthy, rich women are much fewer than men. This is just biological reality and not something inherently unfair or anything.

All other men are competitors that will use every trick in the book to kill us. Women and children first? You fucking kidding me? Why would I die to save women and children that’s not even my biological relative? I won’t even donate a cent.

Okay sometimes I do for experience and curiosity and because for some reason I feel like it. I rarely do. It’s against my principle. I am just tempted sometimes to help others if I think it’s cost effective. I know. Weakness many have exploited.

What is a good strategy for women? Just pick a rich guy and get paid to produce heirs. That’s it.

Life as high IQ pretty women is so simple. Get knocked up by rich smart guy or guys and get paid well for it. Tada… You’re a winner. Your kids will be rich, smart, or have whatever it takes to get rich. You have more grandchildren. You live luxurious life due to jobs’ benefits. What else is truly matter in this world anyway?

Yes ugly fat women will argue that women should be engineers too wasting youth and beauty to be like alpha males. That is how smart pretty women are getting extinct from this planet.

Don’t let inferior competitors promote equality of outcome by following rules designed to benefit the most evil being in this world. Those beings are who can’t compete but insist on winning anyway.

Finally multiculturalism works in United States

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-59457015

“I am grateful to quota systems, race based preferences, lowering of Math and reading standards, huge welfare, and big public school spending to help people of color to be as smart as white. Without all which, I wouldn’t be here.”

Sundar Picai

Keep up the good works fellow comrades. Now we have brown people being CEOs due to our socialist struggles against capitalism.

Rules for The Rich are Different than Rules for the Poor

I think the rules for the rich is different than the rules for the poor. It’s like saying living in land is different than living in sea even though we live in the same planet.

The poor bargaining position is their votes. Most poor people are marxists. So naratives that the more you earn the more you pay is what the poor knows. Poor people are surprised that rich people like Bill Gates can have their wealth increase by billions of dollars and not pay taxes.

The rich bargaining position is competition among governments. In other words, if governments tax income, then it’ll be like Mc Donald charging customers based on customers’ income instead of burgers sold.

All it does is make rich people eat in other restaurants.

So income taxes don’t really work against rich people. In fact, the core theme I see on how to get rich is how to increase your wealth without raising your taxable income.

Is it fair?

Why should someone that create chairs get taxed 30% of the price of the chairs and someone that create companies that create chairs pay far less tax?

It’s stupid.

Neither should be taxed based on income. They should be taxed for using the roads, using gasolines, for securities cops provide, for fire protection. Why should they be taxed based on income?

But that’s how life works. If we can’t change it, might as well take advantage of it.

Main Problem with Communism

The main problem of communism is not that people are lazy. I’ve heard they shot lazy people. But just being diligent is not the one contributing to economy the most. Anyone points out that being a CEO doesn’t mean someone works 1 million times more diligently than normal workers.

The problem with communism is the same problem with democracy.

Somehow it leads to inefficiency and improper allocation of resources.


For example, someone with IQ of a programmer, will just be a driver if the salary differences are not high. Women are more likely to pick someone on welfare if the state took care of their children anyway.


And I see US being worse than China on this area. And yet both are more prosperous than my country. Hmm….. That’s because my country is a closeted communist.