We need More Competition Among States

Free access to scriptures religious leaders try to censor


This is why we need competition among states.

While federal income tax tend to hurt the rich, state tax tend to hurt the poor hence freeing rich people. And the reason why is obvious.

Rich people can simply move to another state much more easily than the poor. So of course they are taxed less. However, that’s not the only good things about competition among states.

Countries are competing too.

Hence, I expect more and more tax can be shoved down back to those evil commies that asked for it.

We need more capitalism and making states compete in globalization is the best way to do so.

Solution of Poverty

The solution of poverty is very simple. There are poor people in US. Those who slip through the crack. But those are rare right? With minimum wage of $10 anyone can just work, live with their parents, and buy bitcoin or play axie infinity or create a start up if he has high IQ and rich parents.

Only 60% of American males are fathers.

Think about it 40% are not fathers anyway. Imagine if the 60% that are fathers are also the richest. That means no need for welfare enough.

I am pretty sure top 60% of all Americans can afford raising children. We’re talking about top 60% here. Every kid have reasonably rich father.

That’ll eliminate poverty like ice cubes in hell.

The 40%? Well they go extinct. They don’t bequeath their lack of business talent, common sense, IQ to their children.

Poverty will be very low. So, less welfare, less tax.

But what about if women prefer the poor? Yea, it’s the women’s choice. Why should tax payers be responsible for women stupidly choosing poor guys as father for their children.

Would you want to support women that don’t choose you and her children?

Are you a cuckold? It’s her right to choose some other guys but money comes with the cock. It’s the corner stone of justice and fairness in all civilization since time immemorial.

But why the 60% that are fathers are not the richest 60%? Many reason. Excessive child support law is one of them. Welfare encouraging the bottom 40% to be father is another.

Just get rid of it. Instead, reward everyone not to have children and make rich people pay child tax and head tax. The rich will have children anyway and pay those child tax.

I would suggest this in my country, but we don’t have welfare, so things are already working out. I love capitalism. Socialism causes poverty, and poverty means no welfare, and we got capitalism.

Meritocracy or Diversity?

Some people believe in meritocracy. Hire people based on merit and only on merit. Use standardized test scores.

Another want diversity. Hire women or blacks.

Of course there are people that want to hire only white or whatever, however those are far beyond normal I never hear them in Mensa Firehouse or any mensa forum.


Here a journal is shelved for not promoting diversity. People don’t debate it. People don’t make rebuttal. No. The journal is just shelved.

Sometimes I wonder, which one will produce more result, and when?
Meritocracy or diversity?

When there is government enforcing certain values, obviously the value favored by the government would prevail.

For example, if the government favor hiring women, then company that hire strictly based on merit may not get government contract. That affects profit.

But what about crypto businesses? What about war? There is no “God” above or government that have any value.

Western government is pro women and against men.

Men are more likely to pay tax and less likely to receive benefit in western countries. I’ve heard there are shelters for women but no shelters for men. Single mothers are treated better than single fathers.

But well. It’s men that fight war. It’s men that win war.

The Taliban is on the other extreme. They just turn women into sex slaves for men that fight for them.

Not that I am advocating it. But well, they won didn’t they?

Why would men fight for a system that discriminate against them? Why would men die for someone else’s wives’ and children?

I am disgusted with welfare because I wouldn’t want my tax money to fund my competitors’ welfare.

Warriors switch side in Afganistan. Rich businessmen reincorporate in tax haven. At the end, on top of governments and their laws, we have natural laws and competition that no body can change.

And it makes me wonder how long will western civilization last if it stops being meritocratic?

When they see greed and selfishness not as something to be properly aligned for mutual benefit but as something wrong that needs to be squashed.

They are rich, but they don’t produce as many children as Islam. What’s the point of being rich if money go to others’ children?

Would ideology, that’s say cruel, evil, but benefit men take over? Time will tell.

Why Bill Gates is a Better Person Than Mother Theresa

I remember having a talk with my professor or some christians how I think Bill Gates is better than Mother Theresa.

They are surprised with the idea. They said that Bill Gates doesn’t sacrifice himself and hence don’t move his emotion.

I was like, why is this guy emotion moved by sacrifice? Is this some hidden racism like bigotry that make him happy if people suffer? Is he a sadist?

I told them that Bill Gates contribute a lot to the economy. He employs lots of people. He makes computer cheap with his open architecture strategy.

We are typing in facebook in PC because of him.

At that time, I didn’t take into account his philanthropy. I think his philanthropy is bad unless done to avoid tax.

But boy. If I know the full story, I would have known how correct I was.

If Mother Theresa is a saint, we are all saint and Bill Gates is super saint.

Thinking otherwise is bigotry against rich productive people and blasphemy against capitalism.


Selfishness in Action

Corrupt governments be like:

Most humans are selfish. Not only most humans are selfish, they are more selfish than capitalists. At least capitalists tend to want win win solution.

How do I make better product so I make more money. But most humans, especially politicians don’t care and just want money at expense of others.

Hence, the nature or resources allocation when the government have a lot of say is like this.

I guess I have to learn to be hypocrites.