Quote from Matt Ridley

Free access to scriptures religious leaders try to censor

This word from Matt Ridley is the main reason why I am so sick of romantic love.

Good  Women Quote By Matt Ridley~Far from being laws to protect women, antipolygamy statutes may really do more to protect men.
http://quotespictures.com/good-women-quote-by-matt-ridleyfar-from-being-laws-to-protect-women-antipolygamy-statutes-may-really-do-more-to-protect-men/


Not only violation of individual freedom, especially freedom to be greedy, freedom to capture larger market price, and freedom to trade peacefully, is evil.

Those freedom often benefit those who can’t compete under free market.

It’s one thing to protect poor people from starvation. Protecting incels from being single by preventing women from picking other men is text book definition of treating women like mere objects.

From my point of view, considering this quote, it’s those promoting monogamy that treat other people like object.

If we see others’ as humans we value their individual freedom. People that don’t are those that treat humans like objects.

As usual, the one promoting racism in college admission say that those who want race neutral policies are racist. The same way those treating women like object by limiting their trade choices keep saying those who want freedom for everyone mysoginist.

If you love other people, respect their individual freedom. That’s it. It seems that such simple rules are a very high bar for most people. And yet they act like people like me are immoral.

And someone says that it’s not even clear what systemic racism is.What other words aren’t clear?

For example:

1. Gold digging. Do all women that want money gold digger or only those excessively do so.

2. Treating women like whores. What does it mean? Does it mean paying them fairly based on value added?

3. Exploitation. When is fucking exploitation? When we pay or when we don’t? Why?

4. Sex object. What are sex objects? Are those beings we can have sex with and produce viable offspring?

5. Empowering women. What does it mean? Does it mean giving choices or taking away choices?

6. Racism? What does it mean? Treating people differently due to their race?

7. Sexism? What does it mean? Treating people differently due to their sex? So all people that are not sexist must be pansexual?

8. Discrimination. What does it mean? Should we accept anyone as CEO by lottery?

9. Capitalism? Is chrony capitalism, capitalism? Again, what are words you think is vague in political discourse that it leads nowhere?

And lots of arguments are wasted because we don’t even agree on what we mean when we say a word.

For example, accepting more Asians to top university is bad because that’s called racism.

Who the hell care something is called what? Also it just confuse people because they have different definition of racism.

To them, discriminating against Asian is the true racism.

Vague words allow people to mislead or otherwise lie in political discourse.

Is it Moral to Lose for Having Moral?

Sometimes I think US lost the war because the moral is too high. And if you lost the war because your moral is too high, then that by itself is immoral.

If Taliban troops kill a bunch of civilians, Taliban don’t care. If Taliban troops take sex slave or grow opium, Taliban don’t care. All they care is if those people serve their purposes or not.

If US contractors, Afgan allies, even pimp, consensually, Afgan girls, they get fucked by US laws. US troops have to get clearance every time they kill a Taliban. I’ve heard one case where 3 out of 4 snipper teams died because they are being surrounded by Taliban because they can’t kill a kid. Is the life of a kid more important than your own soldiers’ life?

Each snipper costs a few millions dollars in training. So what if one or 2 kids got killed. They’re easy to produce.

The way I see it, US put a leash on their allies, and then abandon them. Afgan allies did 95% of the fighting during Obama and 99% of the dying. They die for US, they fight for the US. Taliban can’t launch attack on US because of Afgan allies.

But US just abandons them like that. Now, why would Taiwan, Japan, and the reset care US is their allies? War defending Japan, Taiwan, and the rest will be far more expensive than war against cavemen.

What makes me think relationship should be transactional?

Actually, a high IQ sugar baby I helped to go to get a scholarship in Germany changed my mind and helps me see the truth that trying to make a girl like me is actually a very bad idea.

How do we make girls like us anyway? Not much in our control. It’s set by how we look, on how rich we are. Not much. Mystery. Bull shitters like mysteries.

I thought helping girls achieve their dreams, respecting women, empowering women will make girls like me.

The result seems to be the opposite.

Either they show disgust or I ended up with girls that’s would pick me last.

Actually, keeping things transactional and bargain reasonably seem to make them like me. However, let’s ignore her for a while.

Before her, I put too much attention on whether girls like me or not forgetting that 90% of what a girl chooses is based on incentives. I ended up spending 2 weeks of my income and got very little.

That’s while she is selling herself cheaply to my friend or even for free because she can’t get other sugar daddies easily. She used to be reasonably cost-effective.

After I am generous, she’d rather fuck everyone else but me.
And girls are not the only one that are like that. My friend? You think she is grateful that I introduce very pretty and high IQ sugar babies to my friend?

No.


My friend told her that she should sign up to seeking so she doesn’t need me anymore.

My friend got bored of her, and instead of sending them to me, he throws it away making sure I don’t get any.

One day, losing her biggest sponsor and studying too much she asks money from me. I was pissed. Why she came to me only when she’s desperate. Her other sugar daddies don’t care about her at all and yet I am in the bottom of her totem pool.

However, I felt guilty that got her into this deal. She used to have a job before she met me that she left because we got a deal where I fund her germany study and she lives with me. It’s not my fault she is a scammer, but I felt guilty anyway.

However, again, because I want her to like me, I lend her money, instead of asking for nudes. I thought if I show her respect and lend her money, maybe she likes me. Not much. I lent her $35. But then she keeps wanting to borrow money and I am not getting anything.

I am suspicious. Something isn’t right. All these sugar babies say they like generous men my friend told me that I am paying/giving them too much. Yet they seem to dislike me most.

I asked my other friend what to do and my other friend told me to just let her starve. I have no idea what to do. I paid good money for my other friend to be negotiator. It turns out, my bro is only interested in keeping things simple so he doesn’t have to think.

After she is healthy she fuck my friend again that disrespect her a lot as long as I don’t join. Fuck. My friend walks her on leash like dogs.
It seems that everyone else are cruel to her but me and she prefer everyone else.

I finally offer money for chat. Again not much. Around $3 per hour. I start learning that offering too much means I am not going to get anything.

She said she doesn’t like me because she think I am autistic idiot. Also she told me that girls like money and not me.

At that time I already knocked up another high IQ sugar baby. Keeping things transactional works. That one keeps saying she likes me and that our relationship is not transactional and bla bla bla. She turns me off. But because she gave me a child and her IQ is high, I love her anyway.

So, all this time I want a girl that like me. The truth is, girls I can pay makes me happy more. Also they like me more if I pay them instead of I give money and get nothing.

Now the puzzle starts fitting in. Even if it’s true girls like money, why doesn’t she like me that pays more?

Because she can get my money even though I get very little. She can get my money even though she makes everything sucks. Why? Because I am an autistic idiot that are obsessed with keeping my words and be fair instead of just renegotiate and not paying.

It’s probably like why Afganistan fighters don’t fight Taliban even though the US pay them well.

I thought it’s wrong to break promises. So a pattern of my dealing is I promise one thing in exchange of another thing. The other guy don’t do his part, I keep my part.

While the money is relatively small and the whole thing is experimental, I regret helping other people and be generous. I am not even donating to orphanages now.

Everything is transactional to anyone and I am now very careful that transactions are balanced.

Now, I bargain like fuck when it comes to cash payment. I am still generous when it comes to taking sugar babies to delicious restaurants. Hei I still want them to like me. Burning money in front of potential mate is “romantic”.

That’s what expensive restaurants are for. Of course, I prefer to buy cheaper prawns rather than lobsters now because girls are more impressed with the taste of the food than the sight of the bills. Again, cost effectiveness is key.

It seems that spending that doesn’t really help girls, and don’t empower girls, are actually more useful at making girls like me.

If we give money, she can use the money to be more independent from me. If I let her play good video games and take her to delicious restaurants, the only way she can keep getting those is if she chooses me.

So most white men are partially correct when saying I shouldn’t pay women. Don’t pay cash a lot. A bit of cash speed things up a bit.

I realized that the main reason why kids have poor parents is that their mom doesn’t like guys like me. Hence, it is toward my best interests to ensure my money don’t go to those kids.

Since then I have adopted the Holocaust survivors motto. “Never Again”

Should we care if a girl likes us or not?

I used to care.

Now all I care about is the relationship is cost-effective and the transaction is clear and nobody is scamming each other. That each side get what they want and promised if and only all side get what they want and promised.

There are basically a few reasons why we shouldn’t care too much about whether a girl likes us or not and care more about cost efficiency and specs of our heirs’ factories.

  1. Clear transactions make both sides better off
  2. Making things transactional means my money goes only to girls that add value to me. That’s fair.
  3. Not caring or trying to make a girl like you can make the girl like you more. It also turned off girls that are disgusted with you. So you do end up with girls that like you if you don’t care and not taking any shit.
  4. Wanting to make girls like you can attract girls that don’t like you and make it worse.
  5. You need a clear measurable goal. How much she likes you is not measurable. How often you fuck her is measurable. What she is willing to do for you and how much she charges is measurable.
  6. In the end, cost-effectiveness is more important to your happiness than whether she likes you or not. I am spending 1-3% of my income on each girl. Anything more, and I won’t be happy. Losing half of my wealth in alimony? That’ll make me very unhappy.

But let me tell a bit of my story first.

Actually, a high IQ sugar baby I helped to go to get a scholarship in Germany changed my mind and helps me see the truth that trying to make a girl like me is actually a very bad idea.

How do we make girls like us anyway? Not much in our control. It’s set by how we look, on how rich we are. Not much. Mystery. Bull shitters like mysteries.

I thought helping girls achieve their dreams, respecting women, empowering women will make girls like me.

The result seems to be the opposite.

Either they show disgust or I ended up with girls that’s would pick me last. Actually, keeping things transactional and bargain reasonably seem to make them like me. However, let’s ignore her for a while.

Before her, I put too much attention on whether girls like me or not forgetting that 90% of what a girl chooses is based on incentives. I ended up spending 2 weeks of my income and got very little.

That’s while she is selling herself cheaply to my friend or even for free because she can’t get other sugar daddies easily. She used to be reasonably cost-effective. After I am generous, she’d rather fuck everyone else but me.

And girls are not the only one that are like that. My friend? You think she is grateful that I introduce very pretty and high IQ sugar babies to my friend? No.

My friend told her that she should sign up to seeking so she doesn’t need me anymore.

My friend got bored of her, and instead of sending them to me, he throws it away making sure I don’t get any.

One day, losing her biggest sponsor and studying too much she asks money from me. I was pissed. Why she came to me only when she’s desperate. Her other sugar daddies don’t care about her at all and yet I am in the bottom of her totem pool.

However, I felt guilty that got her into this deal. She used to have a job before she met me that she left because we got a deal where I fund her germany study and she lives with me. It’s not my fault she is a scammer, but I felt guilty anyway.

However, again, because I want her to like me, I lend her money, instead of asking for nudes. I thought if I show her respect and lend her money, maybe she likes me. Not much. I lent her $35. But then she keeps wanting to borrow money and I am not getting anything.

I am suspicious. Something isn’t right. All these sugar babies say they like generous men my friend told me that I am paying/giving them too much. Yet they seem to dislike me most.

I asked my other friend what to do and my other friend told me to just let her starve. I have no idea what to do. I paid good money for my other friend to be negotiator. It turns out, my bro is only interested in keeping things simple so he doesn’t have to think.

After she is healthy she fuck my friend again that disrespect her a lot as long as I don’t join. Fuck. My friend walks her on leash like dogs.

It seems that everyone else are cruel to her but me and she prefer everyone else.

I finally offer money for chat. Again not much. Around $3 per hour. I start learning that offering too much means I am not going to get anything.

She said she doesn’t like me because she think I am autistic idiot. Also she told me that girls like money and not me.

Now the puzzle starts fitting in. Even if it’s true girls like money, why doesn’t she like me that pays more?

Because she can get my money even though I get very little. She can get my money even though she makes everything sucks. Why? Because I am an autistic idiot that are obsessed with keeping my words and be fair instead of just renegotiate and not paying.

I thought it’s wrong to break promises. So a pattern of my dealing is I promise one thing in exchange of another thing. The other guy don’t do his part, I keep my part.

While the money is relatively small and the whole thing is experimental, I regret helping other people and be generous. I am not even donating to orphanages now.

Everything is transactional to anyone and I am now very careful that transactions are balanced.

Now, I bargain like fuck when it comes to cash payment. I am still generous when it comes to taking sugar babies to delicious restaurants. Hei I still want them to like me. Burning money in front of potential mate is “romantic”.

That’s what expensive restaurants are for. Of course, I prefer to buy cheaper prawns rather than lobsters now because girls are more impressed with the taste of the food than the sight of the bills. Again, cost effectiveness is key.,

It seems that spending that doesn’t really help girls, and don’t empower girls, are actually more useful at making girls like me.

If we give money, she can use the money to be more independent from me. If I let her play good video games and take her to delicious restaurants, the only way she can keep getting those is if she chooses me.

So most white men are partially correct when saying I shouldn’t pay women. Don’t pay cash a lot. A bit of cash speed things up a bit.

I realized that the main reason why kids have poor parents is that their mom doesn’t like guys like me. Hence, it is toward my best interests to ensure my money don’t go to those kids.

Since then I have adopted the Holocaust survivors motto. “Never Again”

The short answer is all relationship is transactional. Making transactions explicit leads to a better outcome for both sides.

I think it’s naive to think that white men’s relationship is not transactional. They just don’t pay in dollars or bitcoin but by marriage, that is actually very very expensive for rich men.

I have no idea why offering marriage doesn’t count as prostitution. However, people implementing inconsistent ideas in favor of rationing women to losers is nothing new in politics.

Splitting commitments into smaller transactions is also a good way to enforce commitment without counting on the government.

I can say to a girl I love her, but how does she know I’ll be around after I knocked her up? I can marry her but how do I know she wants to give me heir instead of fucking the milkman and sue me for large alimony?

How do I convince a high IQ beautiful girl that I’ll repeat order her for life? How do I know that the girls are willing to give me heirs? One way is to commit and get that commitment enforced by the government.

We call it marriage. However, modern democratic government is more concerned about ensuring monogamy rather than ensuring we both got the best deals. Another way is to split the commitments into smaller pieces of transactions.

A good strategy is to start with a small transaction first. Pay for IQ tests. Pay a little for going to the mall together. Pay for the handjob. Pay for 3 some hand job.

Then pay for fuck. Tell her you’ll repeat order her for life and you are desperate for biological heirs and that our children will be rich. And knock her up.

A good time of proposing to a girl is when your cock is already inside her. Doing it while you’re on your knees signals that you are irrational, stupid, powerless, and simps. Girls, as far as I know, don’t like those men.

International Symbol For Marriage Vinyl Sticker
Don’t do it like this!

Once she is knocked up, she is yours for life. Her sexual market value in the eyes of all other guys drops a lot. In business, we call this barrier of entry.

Unfortunately, she will have your child hostage. Otherwise, she can take it away or worse, abort it. So yea, you got barriers around you too. Can’t fuck around easily once I knocked up one.

Money, however, isn’t an issue. After the child is 1-2 years old, she knows that you’ll repeat order her for life and you are a very financially reliable father.

You can bring another SB on the house and she’ll realize she’ll be losing her cash cow and comfortable life if she leaves you.

Having a girl that I knocked up and show other sugar babies that I am a very financially responsible father helps a lot.

Making things transactional helps ensure that the relationship is win-win on each transaction. It’s also fair. Basically, it’s consistent with my idea of assuming all humans are their lowest common denominators.

However, I think not caring whether girls like me or not and not even trying too hard be a good idea. I think doing that can help any men with top 1% wealth to get girls that like him most.

How?

Paying a girl is also a very quick way to know whether a girl likes me or not. Hell, I actually prefer to just eat lunch unless the girl likes me enough to give me heirs at a mere 2-3% of my income. I don’t want STD.

Unlike most white men, I don’t want to risk 50% of my wealth just to knock girls up either.

For all the things about I am so undesirable that I got to pay for sex, most white men actually spend way more money on their girls than I am.

So if a girl gives a handjob cost-effectively, that means she wants long term relationship. A very quick filter.

A sugar baby that doesn’t like me will charge a lot of money even for lunch. She plans to get the most money at the least service and then go.

A whore that likes me will do well and charge less because she wants the relationship to continue. So aiming for cost-effective whore is a very good measure that the relationship can work in the long run.

Scoring on girls builds oxytocin on her brains, making her like you. The easiest way to do so is to have access to her body. The easiest way to do so is to just pay.

In general, if short-term transactions are win win, then long term relationship is likely.

Of course, cost-effective doesn’t mean I pay the cheapest whores. I aim for high IQ girls that are also pretty. Currently, I hope the IQ is in top 4%, hopefully, top 2%, and whose beauty on top 20%. Also cheap whores may fuck others and have STDs, which is costly if not deathly.

That is why I avoid paying for sex until a few months into the relationship. Most sugar babies aren’t really whores. However, like all women, the best way to deal with them is to treat them like one.

But then again, do you really care she likes you or not?

All I care about is the girls are pretty and have high IQ. I want children with good genes.

I also care that the relationship is win win. If she doesn’t like me and then leaves for another guy that says, pay better, I can’t stop her. It’s just not meant to be.

I don’t care if the stars are aligned. I care that the price match.

I care that I can happily financially support her because she brings a reasonable amount of happiness to me.

Most importantly, I care that if the relationship went south, we had a great time together and can still be friends. I hate having enemies.

How do I end up This Way

My opinions are often controversial. For example, why do I think all relationships should be transactional? Don’t I care whether a girl likes me or not? Well, here is a story of how it happened.

The short answer is all relationship is transactional anyway, and making it explicit makes both sides better off. My financial arrangement with my sugar babies is actually very similar with normal husband and wife relationship. I financially support her for life and she gives me heirs and sex. However, we make our own deals instead of caring what societies think marriage should be.

Well, it began 20 years ago. Basically, the only girl I wanted to marry someone else. So, I was wondering how to get girls. How to make them “like me”.

So I learned evolutionary psychology. Science is the only thing I can understand. The rest, as far as I know, are bullshit. Later I learn that whether a girl likes me or not is very relevant.

Most people in my circles, for example, agree that a girl deserves to be stuck for life with her husband because she agreed to it. That puzzles me to no end because people keep saying that prostitution is not consensual even though prostitutes, unlike wives, can leave their job much more easily.

Of course, the law doesn’t really say so and I learn that the hard way when a lawyer scammed me on my divorce 10 years after. Most guys and girls get married without even knowing marital laws and they face devastating consequences.

Since then I am just very convinced that anything governments do is bad for capitalists. That motivates me to use bitcoin and capitalism has been generous to me.

I studied evolution theory. Concepts like marriage, monogamy, and love, and romantic love, and so on are not there to protect beautiful women from bad deals.

All those concepts are there to control women. Men and women, in general, do not want to empower women or other men. They want to weaken other men and women so they can better compete to get spouses.

And that’s not my opinion. Matt Ridley, Satoshi Kanazawa, and other evolutionary biologists say so too.

I once suggested that Afgan women should be mistresses of European men. Many women disagree. It puzzles me. Those Afgan’s women are now worse off. Why would a group that says they want to help fellow women prevent women from consensually picking an obviously better outcome?

Of course, if you know evolutionary psychology, you know the answer. Women do not want to help other women. They just want to keep competitors out. Of course, cheaper women that are just as pretty are very tough competitors.

Monogamy ration females to “losers”. This stabilizes humans’ society. And that’s what feminists and most westerners want all women to do. Many of them want to prevent racial mixing too I guess.

Hence, I see love, romantic love, as some form of socialism. Romantic love is like Nazim or Talibanism. Nothing is about loving another there. We are selfish species.

All I see from those supporting romance, love, marriage, and feminism are hatred against innocents doing nothing wrong. Those bigots hate porn stars, whores, sugar babies, and so on even though those who they hate don’t even hate them back.

And that’s why I feel like I should speak about what I think is really going on. Would you wish you had spoken out when Nazi is in power? Well, Nazi isn’t in power. Monogamists are.

Romance has destroyed lots of lives, bankrupt many rich smart men, and make many children have poorer parents.

Romantic love has caused lots of suffering in the world and I think people should see this anti-capitalist nonsense as what it truly is, anti capitalists bigotry.

Why I Aim to get Cost Effective Heir Factory

For all the talk on how I can’t make a girl like me, I spend only 2-3% of my income on girls and they give me heirs.

I don’t beg women to give up half of my wealth pretty much unconditionally.

My Sugar Babies are prettier than most women here and most wives people here have. And they are all Mensa material or close to it.

Perhaps it’s about time people realize that all relationship is transactional anyway. Making it explicit makes it more fair and lasting.

All those talks about respecting women, or women want to be the only one, or no one wants to give us children if we don’t marry them, are plain out lies.

Those are made by those supporting monogamy civil marriage. The way we evolve, when we’re not at war, we’re in race. Run well.

Also, children don’t need their biological father to change diapers. Nannies can do that more cost-effectively. Children need high IQ, biz skills, and richer parents.

Fortunately for me, many smart pretty women realize that.

What should have been done in Afganistan?

I don’t know what should have been done in Afganistan. To be honest, I am not an expert.

Maybe US should just hire cheap Afgan mercenaries to conquer the whole territory.

Maybe US should pay based on the result. Instead of paying salary to join Afgan army, US should pay based on controlling territory or killing Taliban soldiers. Or maybe US should split Afganistan into smaller countries. That way each can go where they like.


You know what. I am not a fan of democracy. I prefer capitalism. That being said, even democracy isn’t that bad in solving this kind of problem.

Why American public doesn’t know that we are losing in Afganistan? Why there is not much discussion till things are really bad?

The war, while expensive, cost $1 trillion. That is small compared to American 22 trillion dollar GDP. For 20 years, American has 440 trillion dollar GDP. If war costs $1 trillion we’re talking about .25% of American GDP.

For comparison, Afganistan has 26 billion dollar GDP. If I were an average Afganistan, I would want to be colonized. Given that US has 15k troops in South Korea, Japan, and Europe, I see no reason why a mere 2500 troops in Afganistan can be a problem even if they are there indefinitely.

As Afgan get prosperous through democratic and capitalism combo, they will not give up their country so easily. The cost can get even cheaper if Afgan troops, instead of American troops fight. How can American motivate Afgan troops to fight? Bounties.

It cost on average 37 million dollars per killed Taliban. I think there are ways to make this cheaper.

All in all, I am very disappointed. I can see something worse than 9/11 is going to happen and that people will say American deserves it for abandoning their allies and not slaughtering their enemies.

Also, I’ve heard China told Taiwan how the US abandon their allies. If the US can’t win the war against poor cavemen, how can they win war against China when China invade Taiwan? Why doesn’t Afganistan become another Japan or Western Europe? Who knows.

Is it Smart for Taliban to Force Women into Sexual Slavery?

By the way someone got mad when I said that Taliban is “smart” in turning women into sex slaves. Maybe there is a misunderstanding here. Of course, I don’t advocate doing the same strategy. It’s unethical. Not capitalistic. It’s also politically incorrect.

The correct strategy, if you’re rich, is, of course, pay, rather than force. But the Taliban isn’t rich (compared to Americans).

The thing is. Taliban has little money. Yet it fights the richest most advanced nation on the earth and won. Put your self in their shoes. Can you win waging war against the US?

It is unethical, wrong, bla bla bla…. But why isn’t this considered smart?

I am not saying it’s a good thing. But if smart is defined as coming up with working strategies to solve difficult problems and end up succeeding, it seems that the Taliban did it.

Taliban fighters are motivated. American voters and Afgan’s army isn’t motivated. So how do you motivate your employee? You use incentives. What about if you don’t have money or resources to offer? You control other people’s resources and distribute them to your employees. It works.

What do you think?

When we see suffering, we can do 3 things.

We can do nothing.
We can spend a lot of money helping the person. Usually, we get tired soon and end up doing nothing.
We trade.

Trade seems like a good balance between pursuing profit and not being an asshole.

Of course, those with little to offer, don’t usually trade. They use forces. For those people, using force looks smart to me.

Where am I wrong?

Maybe I misunderstood english word for smart. Where am I wrong here?

It is precisely because it’s smart and profitable we need big deterrence against such practice. If what they did is dumb we don’t need to worry.

That is why I think US shouldn’t pull out and should have killed as many Talibans as possible by cheap methods like hiring Afgan mercenaries.

Did US do that? No. Do they have any deterrence? No. So it’s smart.

It’s smart to do evil if we’re not going to be punished for it anyway. Think about it.