Welfare is the main cause of poverty

Free access to scriptures religious leaders try to censor

There are things that I agree with woke. I think it’s immoral to have poverty in rich countries. I just disagree about why is that.

Poverty happens because of welfare. Welfare encourage poor people to breed. If parents are on welfare, chance is children are on welfare too.

Wokes concentrate too much on what government should do to make poor people rich. Wokes ignore who are reproducing. I think Bill Gates’ sons will be richer than welfare parasite sons even if they start of the same.

Woke think poverty happens due to lack of welfare.

Actually welfare that doesn’t encourage the poor to breed can be a good solution. Just pay people not to have children, for example. For the same amount money there will be less kids with poor dad.

Think about it. Even if governments spend money on education for poor kids, if the kids do not have talents or IQ to learn, then those are just wasted money. Rich people got what it takes to be rich. Poor people have less chance to do so.

However, any party that wants more vote will want to create large number of poor voters. Such party, like democrat party in US, will punish diligent productive people with income taxes and reward poor people for breeding with welfare.

Like, wokes, I also agree that white people are somewhat responsible with why the blacks are relatively poorer. Again, I disagree with the reasoning. The main cause is not slavery hundreds of years ago. The main cause of black poverty is again, welfare.

There are parasites in every race. There are people that due to lack of IQ or lack of common sense, genetically predestined to be parasites instead of say, start up founders.

In no other country in the world, parasites can breed 10 children expecting government to pay for it. Not in Indonesia. The kids will just starve. Not in China. They have 1 child policy. Not in Singapore. They’re capitalistic. Not in Japan I think.

If poor parasites have many children we will have many poor parasites in the future.

However, white people is obsessed with subsidizing poor people to have more children. In Europe, their homeland, there is even more welfare. Perhaps they think people won’t just breed like rabbit when there are welfare because they too want higher standard of living.

The thing is it doesn’t work that way with people from other cultures. Starving children is their main incentive to control their behavior. Once there is welfare, they just breed.

Many black people were catching up with whites, according to Thomas Sowell. When hard work and productivity is rewarded by capitalism, everyone is productive. But then, the woke create welfare.

Hard work is punished by income tax and breeding is rewarded with welfare. It just happens that more black people are in this cycle. However, it happens in any race.

So welfare and redistribution of wealth is the source of evil and not the solution. And that’s where I disagree with wokes.

Why Rich People Should Have More Children

Another thing I noticed is most people, especially liberal, tend to overestimate the effect of rich parents when it comes to welfare. Oh look it’s not fair that their parents are richer so we need more redistribution of wealth.

However, they underestimate the effect of rich smart parents when it comes to reproductive right. Poor kids would have been rich too had we fund more public schools. So? More government programs. Fed the poor, educate the poor at tax payers’ money.

In both cases they want the poor to have as many kids as possible and get taken care of by tax fund.

So, do having rich parents useful or not when it comes to producing rich kids?

It seems that instead of what’s true, liberals want people to believe whatever justify more redistribution of wealth.

I see things differently. If rich parents produce rich kids, then rich people should have more children. This assuming that the wealth is earned productively, which is what will tend to happen under capitalism and less government anyway.

It’s simple. Say the following are true. Rich are more productive. You want more productive people in your society and kids are like their parents, just breed the rich.

What about if rich parents don’t produce rich kids? What about if those poor kids can be smart and productive if they are properly educated and fed? The solution is still, for the rich to have more children.

If you are rich and your kids will just be as rich as other kids, what’s the point of being rich then? What’s the point of working hard, be a good responsible parents if your kids will just be as rich as other kids?

It make more sense to simply have more children yourself. If you have too much money that means you have to few children.

This will motivate people to be productive, rich, and good parents.

Biggest Difference Between Conservatives and Liberal

https://edsource.org/2021/university-of-california-must-drop-sat-act-scores-for-admissions-and-scholarships/

I think the biggest difference between conservatives and communists is in how they think equality is fair.

Communists believe that inequality is unfair, no matter how it’s achieved. Conservatives can tolerate inequality, also no matter how it’s achieved. Libertarians tolerate inequality depending on whether that inequality earned fairly, productively, and/or consensually.

However, each side pretends as they care about the others’ value. So they often lie. Say Bob is poor because her mom is a slut that fuck for free. Then commies will say Bob is poor because his ancestors were slaves. Say Alice scores high in standardized tests due to her parents picking mates with superior genes. Commies will say the standardized test is racist. Here, commies present narratives that make even libertarians care. The issue they make isn’t an issue at all.

Even if smarter students have higher IQ and hence earn a better grade and graduate faster and have some meaningful ways of their high IQ, commies will say it’s unfair. Because the result is unequal. They will say unfair no matter what the cause of those IQ test differences.

As humans, we don’t act based on facts. We act based on our beliefs. Hence, anything that exposes facts in very obvious ways, like standardized tests, that show that some students are simply way smarter than the other, is then politically incorrect in the eyes of commies.

It doesn’t matter that the students that score higher simply have better genes or better parenting, moms picking richer dad, daddy having more money when choosing to have heirs, or study better, or have more common sense. Commies and leftists will say it’s due to racism, some distant past slavery, some oppressions in the past.

And standardized tests exposed that truth. Unlike wealth and power, for example, that can be earned unfairly, standardized tests are the closest thing to meritocracy. You don’t score better in a test because your ancestors own slaves or because the testers know your race, or because your parents bribe some senators, and so on. Standardized tests show that you are just better at doing tests. Is this because you understand the material better, or because you are genetically superior, it’s pretty obvious that there is nothing unfair with standardized tests.

Conservatives have another approach. They think that inequality is fair no matter how it’s obtained. Conservatives will honor land ownership won through wars, for example. Conservatives will slide with Israel no matter what. Some conservatives will honor dictators for being successful at being on top.

I would say, conservatism will benefit from high IQ. That’s because high IQ people or society that can mobilize their high IQ people are more likely to be on top when hierarchy exists, be it through fair or unfair means. However, many conservatives also have rules that hurt high IQ people, like monogamy or religious dogma.

Also, some inequality that some conservatives may promote may be the idea that some people just deserve genocide.

Libertarians are somewhere between. When it comes to producing wealth through productivity, there is no amount of inequality libertarians are not willing to tolerate. When it comes to other means, then libertarians don’t have agreements.