Do I fail to understand the world or do I understand it too well?

Free access to scriptures religious leaders try to censor

I think affirmative action is just racism.

I think schools are gun free zone because government is in protection business and death kids raise fear and hence tax. If schools are safer because it’s gun free, why not make white house gun free?

I think minimum wage is a way to keep blacks out of job.

I think true purpose of government intervention in education is to indoctrinate rather than to educate. There once was a poor lady that cook stones to calm down her starving daughter. School teachers are like that.

I think war on drugs are really war on black and ways to control others’ happiness. It never is about danger. Arguing that drug is not danger is like arguing to robbers that you are better off keeping your wallet.

I think monogamy is there to ration females in equal share for everyone.

I think child support laws are there to prevent rich men from reproducing too successfully rather than supporting any child.

I think feminazis are ugly bitches that can’t get paid for sex or get a husband.

I think women trafficking laws are there to protect western women from having to compete against cheaper and prettier russian or ukrainian girls.

I think people criticize israel because demonizing jews are simply way more lucrative than demonizing vietcong. Hamas leaders are worth $2 billion dollar doing that kind of job. That is the same reason why people blame and condemn capitalism way more than any other economic system. Capitalism is so fair even those who criticize it makes money rather than being killed. Would you excuse me, I’d like to burn 200 copies of “Wealth of Nations.” Oh wait….

I think right of return of palestinians are very important because israel is a country worth “returning to” due to jews governing their country relatively well. There are so many other refugees in Syria, Iraq, Vietnam, etc, and none of them becomes a big deal like palestinian crisis, because countries that kick them out are badly governed themselves and hence not worth returning too.

I think the reason why jews don’t simply buy palestinian land is the same reason why rich men don’t simply pay women to produce heir for them. When something is important, you can’t just pay for it. There are too many people that would kill to get that and that would often end up with political rather than business solution.

Many people when I said this would say that I do not understand because I am an outsider.

I just think that perhaps outsiders know about what’s inside more than insiders. Imagine going to North Korea and explain to them that North Korea is not prosperous at all. I bet the north korean would say that you don’t understand North Korea. Or Imagine going to Indonesia during Suharto and explains to Indonesians that they’re not in a democracy. Indonesians would say that you don’t understand because you’re not Indonesians and don’t understand Indonesian’s style democracy.

The truth is, some lies, can’t easily be seen from inside. It’s precisely because I am an outsider I can see things. You can’t see problem in Islam easily if you’re muslim. You can’t see problems in christianity if you’re christian. You can’t see problems with feminazism if you are heavily indoctrinated from young that women aren’t sex objects.

If women owe no shit to men why should men owe anything to women?

This got a point. Whether you paid for her dinner, whether you marry her, or whatever, she doesn’t owe you shit.

Good point.

Women has every right to say no for sex under any circumstances. At least according to most western laws they are. There is absolutely no transaction, consensual or not, that oblige women to have sex with anyone.

So why should men owe anything to them? Why should any men agree to marry, commit to pay alimony, etc, if none of those make women owe anything to the men?

I mean, in normal contract, we agree to perform something so they owe us something right. I pay money so McDonald owe me big mac. Imagine if McDonald doesn’t owe me shit whether I pay them or not. I won’t pay McDonald.

In fact, McDonald, consensually advertise their obligation to give me Big Mac when paid. Here, McDonald consent to lose it’s freedom of not giving me McDonald so I pay it money. Is it advantageous for McDonald to have freedom to make such contract with me? Yes. Without being able to make such contract, McDonald won’t be billions of dollars worth of corporation it is.

Imagine employee that says that he owes no shit whether employer pays his salary or not. That employee will never get anyone hiring her. Imagine if all work must be voluntary. No body can be paid for work because it’s demeaning for workers. Will programmers, doctors, and lawyers, be happier?

One out of so many important freedom we have is freedom to lose a freedom. Freedom to owe something. Freedom to sign a contract where we agree to lose some of our freedom. Without that freedom, it’s much harder to persuade others to give us anything.

So why can’t women have that freedom?

Let’s put it this way. What happen if Mc Donald term is similar to marriage. So customer pay and mc donald give burger if the manager feel like it. Also by buying big mac the customer agree to keep paying some life time subscription whether he got burger or not. Then we got tons of customers that pay mcDonald, get nothing in return, forced to pay their subscription, and sent to jail for not paying their life time subscription.

Yea burger king will attract all customers that don’t want to put out with all those nonsense. Burger King is such a whore.

Why doesn’t it happen to women?

Why McDonald and Burger King can whore out their burgers? Why employee can whore out their time? Yet, why can’t women whore out their cunt, and tits, and wombs as easily?

I’ve been fucked over a lot in my life. People steal from me. They committed fraud against me. When I tried to destroy his life he bitched that I were the one frauding him. The forum mod didn’t My ex employee become my competitor. My partner want me to be programmer and hide that fact before the partnership start.

I felt I were a victim. That it’s all THEIR fault. That I am a good guy getting fucked over. That it’s not my fault.

Then I start seeing it from a different point of view.

All those people are simply better politicians.

Think about it.

Through out millions of evolution humans brained are genetically hardwired to be better politicians and businessmen.

That means we lie better. We kill better. We are the best hypocrites. In a sense we think it’s evil. We rightfully think so. All those traits are things that can be very costly for the overtly naive.

But then again, the traits are so common. As M says to James Bond, if we only do biz with honest people we will never deal with anyone.

There is a certain industry standard of morality. Be a fraud and you’re an asshole. Too honest and you are eaten.

I am the one that insist on behaving “my way”. I behave in ways that are way out of norm. So naturally people suspect I am the one that’s problematic.

I have goals and considerations that’s unusual. For example, rather than having short term profit I want reputation that people that deal with me are profited. What happen is they are often profited, at my expense, and claim that I am the asshole.

It makes perfect sense.  If you see someone keep having problem with everyone else, who is the trouble maker? That person. It makes perfect sense.

I were the one that are far worse politicians than most people.

But why am I a far worse politicans? Is it due to my lack of IQ? Is it due to my lack of understanding of politic?

I think this part is interesting. When a skill is important for genepool survival, our skill does not necessarily depends on IQ or game theories understanding. We can just follow our feeling and we will automatically be at least a mediocre politicians. Remember when we say thank you after being given money? We instinctively say thank you.

So why am I not a good politician? I have feeling too. I evolve?

That’s because I think politic is evil. I am a libertarian. I feel all those dishonesty, inconsistency, tacts, are evil. “If yes say yes, if no says no. The rest is from evil.” says Jesus. I used to believe that.

Imagine if you are a socialist believing that wealth is evil. Will you be rich? No. Any way you can get rich will feel evil to you and you just avoid it. Then you don’t have money to buy stuff you want and afford your kids. Then you bitch about not having money (and demand government to pay for it).

Libertarian has similar problem. They think politic is evil. They think power is evil. Then what? Will they be powerful? No. Then they bitch about how they get fucked over. The thing is, that’s just what happen to powerless people. They get fucked over.

Repeatedly I made decisions that put me in very weak position. I didn’t even care. It made my stomach churn. Yet I kept convincing my self that I did the right thing and if things go wrong it’s the others’ fault.

I, for example, fill someone else’ adsense account and expect the fraudster to keep their word paying their fair share of revenue. Do they? Most of the time they don’t. I was just mad. I didn’t see it as it’s my fault for counting on others’ honor. I saw that as the fraudsters’ fault for lying to me. Of course they lied. Humans are honed to be successful politicians. Successful politicians lie.

Are there ways to solve my problems? Sure. I can use escrow, etc. But then I didn’t think. I just made very unstable deals and get fucked over.

How to change that?

I should stop thinking that politic is evil. I shouldn’t fuck over people. However, I should do so by properly understanding that it hurts my reputation. I should protect my reputation. Before, I think protecting my reputation means not screwing others. That’s it. If others believe that I am screwing others, even though I am not, it’s everyone else’ fault. That is irresponsible.

Guarding my reputation means having witnesses and notarize to see the deals. Guarding reputation means having proofs that I am the right guy. Having good reputation means showing MY side of the story, rather than being objective.

Being responsible means being selfish. Being fair toward others means being selfish. Others are selfish anyway, it’s not fair to sacrifice our profit for the sake of fairness. Fairness is up to society after all.

In short, I should stop thinking that politicians are evil. I should learn that politic is part of the game. I can’t get out of it like fish can’t get out of water. I should learn from it. I should mimic others’ morality standard rather than making my own. Not too high, not to low.

Now I said that those vermin are better politicians.

Is it politically wise to screw people?

If the person is as irresponsible as I am, it is indeed wise. Then again, most people are like me.

How many people think, if government officials are screwing us, it’s their fault, it’s not the true intent. How many people think, I honestly think ganja is dangerous. I so I prohibited it? Well, turns out it’s not. It’s not my fault, I am being lied too.

When we do all that, when the outcome is different than what we want, we are just lying to our self. We don’t really think ganja is dangerous. We instinctively want to control what people want. Then we believe whatever nonsense that justify it. We wanted to be lied too. We just lie to our self.