Free access to scriptures religious leaders try to censor
I got an idea of how we can resolve all controversial topics. I do not think this should be resolved with the arguments. I think this should be resolved by residency valuation and the market mechanism.
Different cities/states/provinces have different rules and then the residency has a valuation that can be bought and sold. Anyone that wants to move and live and vote in a city needs to buy residency. They got to wait till someone else want to sell or until the city issue a new residency.
In other words, cities/states/provinces should have “owners” and run for profit. The owners are just the voters of course.
I think states or cities with sensible rules will see residency valuation go up. This will give incentive for voters to use common sense when making rules.
For example, 𝐚 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 don’t just allow but also 𝐬𝐮𝐛𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐢𝐳𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧, contraception, 𝐨𝐫 𝐦𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐬 𝐢𝐭 𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲 𝐢𝐧 𝐞𝐱𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐰𝐞𝐥𝐟𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐰𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐥𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐩𝐨𝐨𝐫 𝐩𝐞𝐨𝐩𝐥𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐧𝐞𝐱𝐭 𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧.
That means more roads, more bus, 𝐥𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐦𝐞, 𝐥𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐚𝐱𝐞𝐬 (conservatives love this). In fact, 𝐢𝐟 𝐩𝐨𝐨𝐫 𝐩𝐞𝐨𝐩𝐥𝐞 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐬𝐨 𝐟𝐞𝐰, 𝐞𝐚𝐜𝐡 𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐛𝐞 𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐧 𝐜𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐢𝐥𝐲 (liberals love this). Of course, people want to move there. Residency valuation goes up.
We don’t argue Burger King is better than Pizza Hut. Why argues whether abortion should be legal or not?
Of course, if Burger King is not delicious the valuation of their share will drop because customers will move somewhere else. That will motivate them to cook delicious burgers.
The same way, if residency has a valuation, and voters make stupid rules, the valuation of their residency will drop. This will motivate them to make sensible rules.
Just like some will go to Pizza Hut and some will go to Burger King no matter what, there is no one right answer for everyone. Just let other people be different and live far away from you. You’ve not been affected in any significant way anyway so who cares.