Genetic Lottery and Racism

I think there is this idea is even if some people win genetic lottery more, it’s still racist.

How? I think the real issue is that some people win genetic lottery makes the one that’s not winning jealous.

Of course, races tend to have different proportions of those winning genetic lottery. So, they turn this into racial issue.

What they really want is equality against those winning genetic lottery.
That means against, say, the high IQ.

So the issue of BLM isn’t really racism. Some have high IQ and earn a lot. Some have low IQ and earn less and get shot by cops more.

It just happens that any trait, like IQ or skin color, is not even distributed equally among races. It’ll be highly coincident if all races have the exact same IQ average given that they don’t even come in droves from the same place and time.

So they can make it look as if the issue is racism.

So why “racism” in NBA isn’t an issue? That’s because unlike IQ, athletic ability isn’t such a big thing in most income distribution. On average, in most societies, IQ gives far more edges than any other traits. So woke always favor races with lower IQ average.

IQ is what mainly separate humans than other animals. It’s what separate us from them.

High IQ Policies

What government policies are good for high IQ and what’s bad on average? I would say absolute or relative. War benefits high IQ relatively but bad for everyone including high IQ on average. I’ll give samples.

Globalization and automation are good. That’s because the low IQ jobs are the ones replaced first.

Also, it benefits the economy as a whole. So it benefits high IQ in relative and absolute terms, on average. Age-based education is bad.

It slows down high IQ people. Everyone moves at the same speed. Capitalism is good. High IQ tend to earn more money under capitalism.

Affirmative action? Bad. It’s just racism. Also, many high IQ advantages are curbed under the pretext that it’s racist.

Government-sponsored eugenic is bad for high IQ. Usually, the one gets slaughtered is the high IQ (jews in ww2).

Free market eugenic is good for high IQ. People finding smart mates help high IQ reproduces. There is a market for high IQ sperms and eggs. High IQ people are more likely to reproduce.

Abortion is good for high IQ. Low IQ people abort babies more.

Drug legalization is good for high IQ. High IQ people are more likely to use drugs and less likely to get addicted. Many high IQ people benefit greatly from drug usage. Some notable ones include Steve Jobs that got inspired by using LSD.

Welfare is bad for high IQ. High IQ people are less likely on welfare and more likely to have rich parents.

Certification is good for high IQ. High IQ people learn faster and can simply get certified to show their abilities. Relative to degrees, certifications like MBA is good for high IQ.

Why we need educational reform

All this having been said, the one obstacle for high-IQ people that average-IQ people don’t have to deal with is education. Education on the global sense, and specifically public education in first-world nations, is built around the center of the Bell curve, focusing almost all of its energy and effort onto the 90% of the population centered within 10% of the statistical mean for IQ. (IIRC in the US this is centering on a mean IQ of 104, or covering a range of about 90 to about 120.) The farther from the center of the curve you are, and this applies for both over and under, the less effective commonly-employed methods of education are for you. When you reach the top or bottom 10% you’re at the edge of the current system’s usefulness, and the falloff is exponential after that. I placed at the top 0.2% as a middle-schooler, and had already come to the realization that the only benefit I derived from public education as of that point was in developing social skills – I wasn’t actually learning anything to speak of in school and was doing most of my new skillset acquisition on my own by reading and through hobbies. High-IQ folks and low-IQ folks both need specialized instruction in order to maximize the usefulness of what they have, and while this is pretty widely available to varying degrees for the lower end of the curve (e.g. special classes for students with learning disabilities), there’s not as much available for the upper end (aside from things like magnet programs that cater to exceptional students, but these are often incomplete). This is the principal barrier that relates to IQ, and it directly penalizes the abnormal, whether high or low, but works out more or less ideally for the average.

How to Breed

Imagine if you’re the top richest 1% in your country. Say you want to produce 50 children. How would you do it? You’re a man.

Basically, you’re like Bill Gates but you want to avoid paying inheritance tax. So you just want each of your children to have enough.

If you are rich, instead of donating the money somewhere else you produce more children. How would you do it?

Most of my posts can be a summary to answer that question.

Oh ya, you love individual freedom so much. So marriage and religion is out of the question.

Also you’re a hedonist that like sex party. You don’t want STD.

However, you don’t mind being financially responsible to your children.

Don’t Love. Pay

Communism is like loving your sugar baby. No…. Pay…. Don’t love. Pay….. If you love her she will think you’re an idiot.

If she gets your money without working she’ll never work, as people in communism or welfare.

Then she’ll just choose a capitalistic sugar daddy that takes advantage of her poverty. Taking advantage of very poor girls capitalistically is the highest moral thing people can do in the world. The girl loves it.

After she is no longer poor and has a choice, who will she come back? The wise capitalist that pay her for bdsm or the stupid feminist socialist that lend her money knowing full well she’ll scam?

A wise whore knows that she’ll make more money with capitalist minded SD.

The one that loves will get nothing and once getting nothing will stop loving. The one that pays will get something and keep paying and paying. Paying is win win. Loving is for loser. Don’t love. Pay.

Pay works. Love doesn’t. Capitalism works. Communism doesn’t.

So how did I end up with the one I love? Well, I knocked her up first and she’s stuck with me. Also, I start off by paying her and that’s probably what makes her love me.

So yea, I guess it’s okay to love her because she’s not going anywhere anyway. For the rest, pay, don’t love. Play the game right.